The charts show the amount nd quality of water supplied to two regions of the world.
The bar charts depict the quantity and purity of water that was distributed among the people in Australia and South-East Asia in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, It is evident that the amount and the quality of water in Australia was double than that in SE Asia. However, although the quantity of the water was increased in South-East Asia, its cleanliness was not improved.
To begin with, maximum (80%) people were provided water in Australia whereas the proportion of water receivers in SE Asia, was almost half than those in Australia in 1990. However, over the period of twenty years, every Australian citizen got water. Similarly, A huge change was witnessed in SE Asia as the proportion of individuals receiving water there had been double than in 1990, during the same time period.
On the other hand, in the case of water purity, Australia was again winner as it was distributing 70% fresh water to its inhabitants while the purity level in South-East Asia was just 40%. In 2010, Australia improved its water quality to above 80%, but in SE Asia, it dropped slightly to under 40%.
- The three pie charts depict how popular five different social sites were among people in a specific nation in 2011 2012 and 2013 78
- The two pie charts compare the production of energy from different five sources in the USA in 1980 and 1990
- The charts show the amount nd quality of water supplied to two regions of the world 61
- The two pie charts compare the production of energy from different five sources in the USA in 1980 and 1990
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, so, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82258064516 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52814541725 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5138617303 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128231979946 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760861830348 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395146187487 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949034444881 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179998686497 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.