Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it and this lead to a more satisfying working life
Recently, drawing up a future plan has become debatable in many parts of the world. It is a common belief that determination an ideal job early as well as pursuing this dream can l lead to the development of well-being with working life. Nevertheless, I maintain that there is no need for spending the rest of life with the career path which is decided as early as possible.
To begin with, citizens have to familiarise themselves with enormous changes in the fast-paced lifestyle on a daily basis. In other words, in the 4.0 Industry, to meet social changes in their requirements effectively, people have to update their personal thoughts relentlessly. Indeed, maybe one often expresses a desire for this job and also their parents wanted; however, it has not been on the top of the ranking and become a trivial job in later life. Therefore, alteration in their direction is indispensable to survive in the overwhelmingly competitive atmosphere. According to the Oxford survey, approximately 78% of adolescents can achieve their coveted award-winning by hot fields although they did not determine what they do from an early age.
On top of that, adults can recognise their own strengths as well as weakness throughout their lives, and following the strong points can result in the proficient at future work. To put in another way, since adults were young, from a career training program, doctor instantly became their ideal job. Conversely, during their studying period, they know that they are good at painting and covet to be a well-known artist. According to the Dream club in America, just over 87% of workers used to change their plans for their lives by following their talents.
To sum up, the highest percent of individuals satisfied with what they do in the whole life belongs to one who has more stress on abilities and global trends. For these reasons, it is easy to see that changing the directions flexibly will allow citizens to get positive emotions with their working lives.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers should be paid more while many people think that other people like film actors or singers should be paid huge sums of money due to the importance of the work that they do and their rol 78
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as well as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97904191617 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79880553399 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607784431138 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1647468125 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.785714286 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286518934073 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834477126278 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515916601416 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16009299678 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563259848744 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.