Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better for government to spend money on building
modern housing than on preserving historic or
traditional buildings and homes.
It has been a controversial argument particularly over the past few decades about whether historic and traditional buildings should be preserved or governments are better to build new modern housing. Although some people are the leading proponents of the claim that modern buildings are more beneficial, I to contrary repudiate this idea. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, one of the most interesting facets of current discussion which deserves keen contemplation is that historic buildings are the identity of a city or an area that needs to be preserved. To elucidate, regarding new technologies and huge investments, cities are transforming more rapidly these days into modern ones. Nonetheless, old and traditional districts have gained more attention from local people because of the fact that they see these buildings as part of their culture and identity. Let me come up with a compelling example, I grew up in Ekbatan Complex which is known as a traditional vicinity in Tehran. However, despite the fact that people were against the idea of renovation of the whole neighborhood, the government allocated a huge amount of money for it and as a result, nowadays, no one knows about the historic aspect of Ekbatan which is disappointing.
Moreover, another noteworthy facet of ongoing discussion with demands to be reflected is that by preserving old and historic buildings, the possibility of attracting tourists is considerably raised. It is crystal clear that the tourism industry plays a stellar role in the economy of a city regardless of other industries. Furthermore, in spite of the fact that preserving traditional buildings might seem costly at first sight, governments can be noticeably benefitted at the end. Also, it can provide a situation in which local people may run new and small businesses like café's and selling their traditional handicrafts. To pave the way, let me give you an example, Yazd is considered as the most historic city of Iran which a substantial amount of money is allocated to maintaining the city as its traditional figure. It was published that the revenue from Yazd was 37% higher than the money allocated at the first place. Apparently, both the government and people will be rewarded by this procedure.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned arguments lead us to the fact that allocating money to preserve historic buildings should be considered as the priority for governments owing to the identity of cities and the tourism industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-06 | reeya kiran | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-21 | 429602019 | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-28 | pirooz24 | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Royaaa | 86 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | Meysam-Khan | 91 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for government to spend money on building modern housing than on preserving historic or traditional buildings and homes 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to keen'
Suggestion: to keen
...ts of current discussion which deserves keen contemplation is that historic building...
^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...gained more attention from local people because of the fact that they see these buildings as part of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14893617021 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04315838368 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527186761229 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3124174372 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.125 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269011328394 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817757399543 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067180742827 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17433709834 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019139106639 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.