The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented table indicates how employee and factory dimension of British silk industry varied from 1851 and 1901.
Overall, there were more females working in silk generation than male during the period. However, while the number of factories was upgraded, a downward trend was witness in that of total employees.
Turning into detail, in 1851, in comparison to male workers, which has 53.964 individuals, the figure for female was significantly higher, with 76.786. Over the next 50 years, the former decreased gradually to 13.375, whereas the latter also dropped steadily to over 25 thousand in 1901. As a result, starting at 130.750 people in 1851, there was a considerable decline to 38.943 in the entire employees.
Regarding to the remaining category, there were exactly 272 silk factories across the UK in 1851. The number grew remarkably to reach the peak of 761, before slightly reducing to 693 industrial units in 1871. Throughout the remainders of the period, despite a fluctuation, the figure was always kept above 620 factories.
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- There is a belief that supermarkets and manufacturers have a duty to reduce the packaging of products they sell Others argue that consumers must avoid buying products with a lot of packaging Discuss both views of this argument by giving specific examples 89
- People continue to commit crimes even after being punished Why does this happen How can crime be prevented 90
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70484469189 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684523809524 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.7249214245 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156854687908 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610076089399 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597362645791 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10412824941 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611682143042 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.