Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not by local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
In recent years, the issue that local museums and historical places are preferred more by tourists than local inhabitants has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this problem is attributed to by a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions can be considered to tackle this
Some reasons can be cited to explain the emergence of this problem. First, since the region's historical relics have become so familiar to the locals, they are no longer inclined to explore more. In fact, local communities have already known the historical information that is conveyed by the museums or heritage sites, such as war or war relics, through schools or mass media, such as television, radio, discouraging them from learning more about these places. Second, entrance tickets at some historical sites are expensive for the local people to afford. For example, in Dien Bien, a province in northwestern Vietnam, it is rather hard for the residents to make ends meet, let alone to spend money on visiting some famous historical attractions there.
There are some measures the government should adopt to tackle this issue effectively. First, with the view to galvanizing natives to pay more visits, local museums should modernize the ways of displaying items. For instance, museums should apply three - dimensional technology to display objects or information, which triggers the curiosity of not only tourists but also dwellers. Second, if historical relics offer discounts on tickets for local inhabitants, they will become an ideal destination for residents. This means that without worrying about additional expenditures, dwellers will want to visit historical sites in order to broaden their knowledge about their hometown as well as use it as a method of educating their children.
In conclusion, this case has some aforementioned culprits, but certain approaches can be adopted by the authorities to address this. By refreshing the exhibits as well as providing preferential treatment to residents, the museum and heritage sites can attract more visitors from the local areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-02 | Anastasia Chinemerem Izundu | 67 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor To what extent do you agree 80
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media What do you think is the reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not by local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 89
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...are some measures the government should adopt to tackle this issue effectively. First, w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36474164134 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84780939767 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607902735562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3395432949 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.769230769 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358753670896 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11190373732 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588079599127 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219926423933 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371108915367 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.