Things used to be done in home by hands are now being done by machines. Do this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays, things used to be done in home by hands gradually being done by machines because of the development of mechanical development. This replacement is more likely popular in human’s life, which brings them both pros and cons.
On the one hand, some household things such as blanket, curtain or vase done by machines helps us save time, and we can spend that relaxing or doing something else in our free time. For example, it probably takes us one week to quit a scarf, but we can get that immediatly in the quiting store with an acceptable price. What will we choose? In addition, children who are trained to do things by hand possibly are more creative and active than others. They may study better and be good at outdoor activities. Moreover, we can earn some extra money from handmade objects or even do a business on this feild.
On the other hand, people seems to be lazier if most of things are done by machines. Childen nowadays usually spend their time in front of TV, playing games with smartphones or chatting on social network instead of making themselves a cabin or an intersting toy. Consequently, they lack of crafts when they grow up. They prefer to buy things when they need rather than they do it by themselves. Besides, we may not have the “perfect thing” when we buy something that is always ready in the store or somewhere else. For instances, we may find it very hard to get a scarf with the images and the color we want in one store. We have to get to many others to, and it is not only time-consuming but also makes you feel tired.
To sum up, I do believe that what is made by our hand is more beautiful and meaninful, especially, it matches our interests. We should learn craft as a soft skill so that we can improve our creative abilities and teach teenagers or children.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-04-19 | Tran Thi Cam Tien | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to stay in the same type of work all their life and others prefer to change their jobs from time to time Discuss both sides and state your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 56
- Some people prefer to change their jobs from time to time and others tend to spend all their life doing the same type of work What is your opinion
- Things used to be done in home by hands are now being done by machines Do this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 73
- Nowadays dead penalty has been eliminated in many countries However there are some countries still keep that in their national rules Some people oppose to that problem but some others advocate with that strict law What is your opinion
- Getting to university is the best choice 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, things used to be done in home...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which brings them both pros and cons. On the one hand, some household things s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s or even do a business on this feild. On the other hand, people seems to be la...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the things') or simply say ''most things''.
Suggestion: most of the things; most things
...ther hand, people seems to be lazier if most of things are done by machines. Childen nowadays ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...suming but also makes you feel tired. To sum up, I do believe that what is mad...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53353658537 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52304776074 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600609756098 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2678746658 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4705882353 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273146296164 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888235755329 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134095053399 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206113506677 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174793499555 0.056905535591 307% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.