summarize the points made in the lecture ,being sure to explain how they cast a doubt on the specific theories in the reading passage.
Communal online encyclopedias VS Traditional encyopedias
In the lecture professor mentioned how the online encyclopedias are more reliable and convient for user than the traditional one encyclopedias. She explains her view by contradicting the three reasons which are mentioned in the passage.
Firstly the professor said that the online encyclopedias are more effctive.It has all updated information without any mistake. They are very useful for the user. She refutes that the online encyclopedias not follow the academic standards. Moreover, if the traditional one encyclopedias have any error at the time of printing then it will be for decay. It never going to chage immediately.
Secondly , the professor said that the online encyclopedias are safe. They are free from hacking. The online encyclopedias are in only reading format so one can edit it with out authentication. Moreover, they have special type of editor which provides the more security for the data. This editor prevents unknown inforamtion. So they are rrelibale than tradition one. By providing this inforamtion the professor contradicts the statement which are made in the passage that, online encyclopedias get vandalise by the users by performing updation ,altering or deleting the information.
The lastly the professor said that theonline encyclopedias show more diversityin the subject. They provide more information about the related subject.This is more strong point of the online encyclopedias than taditional one encyclopedias. The professor asid that the traditional encyclopedias do not have much soace to provide the lot of information . So there is pace limit.So finally she also refute the point that online encyclopedias divert the user main becayse they are provide more inforamtion than important one.
Finally the professor said that online encyclopedias are good in infoamtion safe and provide more information than traditional one. The traditional one have lot of limitation on space ,information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-03-06 | deepali1234 | 60 | view |
- Recommendation letter by project guide 90
- Write an essay on given lecture. 70
- summaries the points made in the lecture ,being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the lecture 50
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Old friends VS New friends 50
- Some items such as clothes or furniture can be made by hand or by machine Which do you prefer items made by hand or items made by machine Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice 50
She refutes that the online encyclopedias not follow the academic standards.
She refutes that the online encyclopedias do not follow the academic standards.
if the traditional one encyclopedias have any error at the time of printing
if the traditional encyclopedias have any errors at the time of printing
It never going to chage immediately.
It is never going to change immediately.
This is more strong point
This is a more strong point
So finally she also refute the point
So finally she also refutes the point
they are provide more inforamtion than important one.
they provide more information than important one.
The traditional one have lot of limitation on space ,information.
The traditional one has lot of limitation on space ,information.
Sentence: In the lecture professor mentioned how the online encyclopedias are more reliable and convient for user than the traditional one encyclopedias.
Error: convient Suggestion: convent
Sentence: Firstly the professor said that the online encyclopedias are more effctive.It has all updated information without any mistake.
Error: effctive Suggestion: effective
Sentence: It never going to chage immediately.
Error: chage Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: This editor prevents unknown inforamtion.
Error: inforamtion Suggestion: information
Sentence: So they are rrelibale than tradition one.
Error: rrelibale Suggestion: reliable
Sentence: By providing this inforamtion the professor contradicts the statement which are made in the passage that, online encyclopedias get vandalise by the users by performing updation ,altering or deleting the information.
Error: inforamtion Suggestion: information
Error: updation Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: vandalise Suggestion: vandalize
Sentence: The lastly the professor said that theonline encyclopedias show more diversityin the subject.
Error: theonline Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: diversityin Suggestion: diversity
Sentence: They provide more information about the related subject.This is more strong point of the online encyclopedias than taditional one encyclopedias.
Error: taditional Suggestion: traditional
Sentence: The professor asid that the traditional encyclopedias do not have much soace to provide the lot of information .
Error: soace Suggestion: space
Error: asid Suggestion: said
Sentence: So there is pace limit.So finally she also refute the point that online encyclopedias divert the user main becayse they are provide more inforamtion than important one.
Error: inforamtion Suggestion: information
Error: becayse Suggestion: because
Sentence: Finally the professor said that online encyclopedias are good in infoamtion safe and provide more information than traditional one.
Error: infoamtion Suggestion: inflation
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 16 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 16 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 16 2
No. of Sentences: 20 12
No. of Words: 297 250
No. of Characters: 1604 1200
No. of Different Words: 144 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.151 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.401 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.11 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.85 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.22 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.45 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.526 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4