In some countries it can be very difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs despite their experience.
What do you think are the causes of this problem?
and what measures should be taken to solve it?
It is irrefutable fact that getting job after the age of 50 has become an uphill task ever since the modernization took place. Despite of having commendable experience, grey people are not preferred in job vistas owning to several reasons, elucidated in the upcoming segments along with the plausible measures.
First and foremost reason that why middle age people face difficulties in indulging in work is that they are considered doing the work in obsolete manner. To be more precise, such people are deprived of advanced education related to their work field and work with the old techniques which are time-consuming and sometimes are not effective, thus, are rejected by modern industries. The modern engineers, for instance, at present come up with various pragmatic skills while over 50 age engineer would not be able to apply same due to the lack of updated version of studies. Consequently, they are unable to adopt technology and are less familiar with modern equipment. Not only this but also they are not physically fit and mentally agile. By this I mean, after adulthood people have less stamina to cope up with long working as they may have cardiovascular disease and blood pressure problems which can be commonly observed. Therefore, they are given less priority to indulge in jobs.
However, middle age people can be given minor jobs in order to meet their requirements. To illustrate, making them sit idle can mar down there perspective which may lead to stress. Hence, they can indulge in jobs like supervisor, care taker and many more which required no efforts. In Singapore, for example, grey people do jobs like Chef, gardening and many more to utilise their leisure time which contributes a lot in boosting the economy of nation. What is more, instead of eliminating such people from the jobs they should be made occupied to train newcomers about the minute intricacies of that particular business. In this case, they themselves learn a lot of from young employees as well. In return, they can teach their skills to them since they have enough experience.
To recapitulate, I vehemently vouch that due to health issues and lack of familiarity with technology force old people to take back seat at workplace. However, instead of firing them from job, their experience should be utilised in different aspects in terms of training youngsters and supervision and many more.
- some people think that children today are not as fit and healthy as in the past do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Some people believe that parents should not give expensive gifts to their children Do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- Should young people follow older people s advice or is it good for them to challenge older people s opinions and thoughts Discuss both views and give your own opinion Discuss both sides and give your opinion 95
- Because of the busy pace of modern life many children spend most of their time indoors and have little exposure to the natural world How important is it for children to learn to understand and appreciate nature 95
- Some people say that a person s success depends on his her upbringing by parents Do you agree or disagree 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'engineer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'engineers'.
Suggestion: engineers
...ious pragmatic skills while over 50 age engineer would not be able to apply same due to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i mean, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73198246535 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573232323232 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0260701623 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246284687269 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733617190723 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547340502407 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141089901979 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363545912332 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.