Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that children are facing many problems regarding to study all subjects in school days. Some people concur that school students should be taught all subjects, whearas some argue that children should be learnt only those subjects in which students have interest. However, I quibble from them and propound that students must study all school subjects because it's necessary in this competitive era. In this eassy, I will cite light on both perspectives before a logical conclusion is reached.
The adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of learning all subjects at schooling. The top-notch concrete reason is that having broad knowledge of all subjects is required to stand in this cut throat competition of success. To uphold my notion, I would quote an instance of today's jobs which requires different skills and knowledge about various fields. Another rationale can be considered which hauls me to patron is that students can select their favourite subjects in college or university because at time they have sense to opt their interest. However, at school, children cannot able to decide that subject is favorable or not. The rearmost coherent factor which cannot be neglected is that learning different subjects at schooling will open oceans of opportunities in front of them. What is more, it is onus of teachers that they increase interest to students to study all subjects. For example, in my school days, my history teacher was very good and that is why history was become favourite subject of whole class.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that adolescents should be taught subjects they are most interested which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that if students should be learnt favourite subject, they will really be enthusiastic for children. They also uphold that students can learn easily those subjects that thay have interest and they do not waste their time to study other subjects.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting to study all school subjects rather than only selective subjects. However, it's contrary can be overlooked. Consequently, I firmly agree that students should be taught all subjects at school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-19 | hrbhalala | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | srinidhi | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | batman_robin | 87 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | batman_robin | 82 | view |
| 2018-06-18 | batman_robin | 88 | view |
- Professionals like doctors teachers and lawyers contribute equally to society with non professionals including entertainers and sportspeople Thus they should receive equal pay Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples 84
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries children have strict rules of behavior in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like To what extent should children have to follow rules 80
- The plans below show the layout of a university sports Centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- Some people think that not only should professional sports and cultural enterprises be sponsored by the government but also that amateur adult and children groups should get funding Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support you 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, may, really, regarding, so, thus, for example, in general, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22015915119 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65207423312 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535809018568 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0583877108 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.578947368 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322597396429 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110917630284 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699049443875 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220718124442 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228728504101 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.