Earlier technological developments have more benefits in the lives of ordinary people than recent developments will ever have.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
Technology has tremendously shaped our lives in all ramifications. According to some, the ancient products of technology have been more beneficial than the novel ones. I strongly disagree with this notion owing to the palpable positive effects of mobile phones and the internet.
A notable new technological invention is the mobile phone. It has proven useful beyond measure. Unlike the landlines of the old days, mobile phones are more portable and affordable to everyone. It affords users other benefits asides making calls; most mobile phones are internet enabled and also function as cameras. These are some of the peculiar attributes of the modern phones that make them superior to the old landlines which were exclusively made for phonecalls.
Another new invention is the internet. The usefulness of the internet is inestimable; it allows for fast and seamless sharing of data among individuals, also it facilitates international trade by allowing for easy communication between countries. Businesses have flourished remarkably since the advent of the internet because of the ease of communication associated with it. Furthermore, internet has also made online study a possibility, thereby increasing the global literacy levels. This is evidenced by the publication of UNESCO in 2017 which revealed that world illiteracy rate has fallen by 5% in the last decade because online studies is becoming increasingly popular among the people. Certainly, these are feats that cannot be matched by any old technological invention.
In conclusion, technology has had a huge impact in all human spheres of endeavour. Despite differing views about whether or not the earlier technological improvements have had greater benefits on humans, I strongly believe that the latest improvements in technology have impacted humans more profoundly in positive ways.
- Earlier technological developments have more benefits in the lives of ordinary people than recent developments will ever have To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree 61
- Earlier technological developments have more benefits in the lives of ordinary people than recent developments will ever have To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken legally What are the advantages and disadvantages of speaking one langu 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree Spoken communication is always more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wing to the palpable positive effects of mobile phones and the internet. A not...
^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...and also function as cameras. These are some of the peculiar attributes of the modern phone...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 9, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...usively made for phonecalls. Another new invention is the internet. The usefulness of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 114, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ndeavour. Despite differing views about whether or not the earlier technological improvements ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. Despite differing views about whether or not the earlier technological improve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60070671378 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04761663215 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60777385159 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.9653722062 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146494128115 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044658548822 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058064873634 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100880128092 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677610676941 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.