Some people think history has little or nothing to offer, while others say the study of the past helps us understand the present. Write on both views and give your opinion, citing examples from your experience
It is often argued that it is almost impossible for such humanitarian professional field like history to teach people something new or improve their knowledge, while others disagree with this and think that without knowledge about the past people cannot build neither the present nor the future. This essay supports the idea that the information about the past provides better understanding the present. This essay will discuss both points of view.
Many people have opinion that the study about the past is useless due to it cannot help the society in the present. In other words, there is no place for such ancient facts as lifestyle of our ancestors, their worldview about politics and religion, ancient culture, ancient art of war and etcetera in the modern world which favors sophisticated high-tech manufacturing and looks into robotic future. For example, a 2019 study from Pedagogical University of Ukraine showed that 92% of high-school graduates chose technical specialties as a future education instead of humanitarian ones.
However, despite contemporary advances have a big impact on the modern community, people still need to know about their past to better understand the present and avoid, if possible, crucial mistakes in the future. That is to say those people who preferred to study history as a scientific subject or just hobby have better imagination about how our world works. Those people can notice significant mistakes of the officials, explain the causal relationships between the past and the present and if possible, correct the mass flow. In instance, only in Ukraine recently a lot of museums opened exhibitions of cultural heritage and historical values of Ukraine.
In conclusion, while some people have negative attention to history as to scientific discipline or cultural values, this essay agrees that the study of the past supplies people with necessary knowledge about the future, providing better understanding of how our world works.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-05 | katenok84kren | 78 | view |
| 2020-06-05 | katenok84kren | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | lostsonam | 78 | view |
- Some people think history has little or nothing to offer while others say the study of the past helps us understand the present Write on both views and give your opinion citing examples from your experience 78
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think history has little or nothing to offer while others say the study of the past helps us understand the present Write on both views and give your opinion citing examples from your experience 73
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security Others think that people cannot expect to enjoy a job and that having a permanent job is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that music plays an important role in society Others think it is simply a form of entertainment Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...education instead of humanitarian ones. However, despite contemporary advances h...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r understanding of how our world works.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, still, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35256410256 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77073647337 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.3015988844 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.818181818 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3636363636 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217756013156 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873883658504 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542365534614 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137206799612 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271023512324 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.