Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A glance at people’s attitudes toward the use of the Internet brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether governments should offer free Internet access to all citizens like other important services such as road construction. Although some people assert that the Internet is necessary and its advantages help all citizens to improve their quality of life, I am against this opinion and believe that its cons exceed its pros.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that a country is made of people of different ages and personalities, which makes it hard to control the negative impacts of it on young adults. To be more specific, parents struggle to raise their children even when children do not have free access to the Internet, and if the government makes it unlimited, parents cannot observe their offspring’s behaviors when they browse all the websites that are willing to. It is a critical issue for society since the children are the future of each country, and if they do not behave well, the next generation will be more likely to participate in criminal activities. Therefore, it is not logical to provide unlimited Internet access for all people, particularly youngsters.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that the Internet needs a lot of frameworks and maintenance, which is costly for the government, and it is not economically frugal for politicians to devote huge amounts of money for something that is not necessary. To delineate, most countries encounter a tight budget, and they have to allocate their available fund for more significant projects such as education and healthcare. Recent studies conducted at Georgia State University, department of finance, show that people are more concerned about the unemployment rate and ask the government to solve this issue rather than spending money on unnecessary projects that only satisfy rich people.
Admittedly, access to the free Internet has some benefits that nobody can deny. Even poor people can watch their favorite movies and surf websites wherever they are without any problem. However, I still claim that even though it reduces financial burdens on poor people’s shoulders, it is not worth enough to justify its cost for the government. As a matter of fact, its benefits cannot vanquish its harms.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I highly recommend people not to compel the government to offer free Internet. Having access to unlimited Internet gets society into trouble, which is irreversible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-30 | minafathi75 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | heartqq | 88 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | zaid | 83 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | rohamheidari | 68 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | ShayesteTR | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “Television has destroyed communication among friends and family” 80
- •In order to attract more tourists, the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets. Which way do you think is more effective? 76
- TPO24 - Integrated TOEFL essay 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone 59
- Compare and contrast the way of your life with that of your parents Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying for the next generations 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, therefore, well, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18439716312 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81564749773 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.6344423677 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.2 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263323160576 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866979594873 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087859212109 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147086995939 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807739423634 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.