The graph show British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.
The given bar chart highlights the number of ongoing British emigrants in five different countries for the four year period from 2004 to 2007.
The primary trend notable in the provided figures is the popularity of Australia and Spain over New Zealand, the United States of America and France as a final permanent location. In addition to it, the number of British citizens going to France fluctuated in the given time interval.
Australia hosted the major part of people from the United Kingdom in all years with approximately 40 thousand emigrants in 2004, 2005, and 2007 and more than 50 thousand in 2006. The next frequent destination for people from England was Spain with around 30 thousand individuals hosted every year; however, the constand decrease is observed. The third country in the list is New Zealand with about 20 thousand of emigrants arrived from the UK yearly. Similarly to Spain statistics, the figures show the continuous drop.
The least popular states were the USA and France with 20 thousand of British people on average. In contrast to the previously described countries, the number of emigrants fluctuated in the US and France, reaching the peak of 25 thousand in 2006 in the US and around 33 thousand in France in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- The graph shows percentage of adults having obesity in England since 1994 by sex 67
- People who read for pleasure have better imagination and reading skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extent do you agree 61
- The graph show British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 61
- The diagram below shows the process of milk production 61
- The table below shows top ten countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...f emigrants arrived from the UK yearly. Similarly to Spain statistics, the figures show t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, third, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98571428571 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59112824427 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8407905311 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158733309742 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665774082227 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523601860399 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100010566868 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620192269503 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.