In any field, beginners are more likely to make a significant contribution to the field than experts.
The statement states that in any field, beginers are more likely to make a significant contribution to the field than experts. This statement is inherently dichotomous, as it is not always beginners or always experts who make an important contribution to the field. It depends on various factors, and thus,the statement may or may not hold for the given set of circumstances. But in general, I tend to disagree with the general idea of the statement.
Predicting weather a person would make an important contribution to their field is highly complex and does not solely depend on just one or two rigidly fixed criteria. It is very much dependent on the previous education of that person in the concerned field, and also on other non-technical factors like innovative thinking, economic management of available resources, ability to cope woth stress, and in part, on the natural temperament for the field. If a person holds these qualities, it does not matter weather that person is a beginner or an expert; he/she is likely to make a significant contribution to the field. A good example of this is mathematician Ramanujan, who from his early years in the field had made a tremendous contributions. The equations proposed by him are even in use today for several applications.
But as a general rule, apart from the knowledge of the field, even that in many cases, all other qulities are gained by experience; by working in that field for several years. Thus, experienced people are who are experts in the field will be more likely to posses these qualities and thus would be more likely to make an important contribution in the field. Several examples can be given for this such as scientists like Davy and Einstine, who had to work in the field for several years to gain deeper knowledge and propoer understanding before they can make a significant contribution.
However, an important aspect of making significant controbution is innovative thinking. People who have been working in the field for many years may overlook some fundamental assumptions in the field which they may take for granted in their work. In such a case, a fresh outlook is often essential to set the field on the right tracks, and unsurprisingly it comes form a beginner in the field as they come unprejudised and can view critically some of the most established conceptions of the field which experts may have taken for granted.
Thus in conclusion, though I belive that experts are more likely to make significant contribution in any field, it is not a hard and fast rule, and there may be exceptions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-07 | madhav2381 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... It depends on various factors, and thus,the statement may or may not hold for the g...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st one or two rigidly fixed criteria. It is very much dependent on the previous e...
^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'contribution'?
Suggestion: contribution
...ears in the field had made a tremendous contributions. The equations proposed by him are even...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ral years. Thus, experienced people are who are experts in the field will be more likel...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...me unprejudised and can view critically some of the most established conceptions of the fie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...experts may have taken for granted. Thus in conclusion, though I belive that exp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, apart from, in conclusion, in general, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9290617849 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96043516812 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455377574371 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9493844291 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.625 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3125 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535765427048 0.243740707755 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198715204835 0.0831039109588 239% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174797749734 0.0758088955206 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351068763528 0.150359130593 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735562497114 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.