Such non-mainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not addressed by mainstream science.
The area outside the realm of science has long existed in human society. The speaker claims that it plays an important role in satisfying human need. In my view, except some malign cases of unorthodox science, I agree with that it is necessary for human beings.
To begin with, the area outside the orthodox science serves as a counterpart of normal science to fulfill humans spiritual lives. Although we humans have achieved great successfulness in improving our lives, life still exist many things that are beyond the control of normal science. Therefore, humans need to resort to other way to relieve their stress and helpfulness. For example, the power of religious help people to weather the hard. In the past, the disease is unpredictable and relentless, people are suffered from frequently. The power of religious assist people to withstand in these hardships, by bringing people hopes, stamina, and brave. On the other hand, in current society, people face different adversity not only from their families but also their working spaces. This time, religious help people to regain calm and peaceful in our stressful and clamorous lives.
Furthermore, the things in non-mainstream area usually benefits our future development. Human beings possess unique property: imagination, and the area of non-mainstream is the place that human beings can unleash this ability. Many preternatural ideas inspire people’s imagination and potential for the further discovery of the true science. To illustrate, the novel of fiction gives scientists directions that guide them to conceive their theory. If you retrospect the historical fictions, you can find that those ideas describes in one hundred years ago, are gradually realized in modern society, such as the laser, the spacecraft, self-driving cars, and so forth.
Admittedly, some ulterior people utilize weakness of human by preternatural power. In the religious, they abuse the trust of votaries to accrue their money by performing some tricks; in the political area, politician sometimes use the pretense from god to achieve their political goals. In this view, these things in non-mainstream areas not act as the role of satisfaction but the bale of human’s lives.
To sum up, regardless the malign purpose of non-mainstream science, I agree that non-mainstream things is necessary in our society.
- It is the artist not the critic who gives society something of lasting value 58
- Humanity has made little real progress over the past century or so Technological innovations have take place but the overall condition of humanity is no better War violence and poverty are still with us Technology cannot change the condition of humanity 87
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it is justifiable 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporary 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, I agree that non-mainstream things is necessary in our society.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3972972973 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91158864359 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8206130812 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.85 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216310524361 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691132669744 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776273482422 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139043755218 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444010308167 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.