The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music web sites. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph presents a comparison between visits to two new music web sties during a period of 15 days.
Overall, access to the site Pop Parade were significantly higher than that to Music Choice during most of the surveyed period.
On day 1, Pop Parade reported nearly 120 thousand visits, almost three times higher than the figure for Music Choice. In the next 6 days, the number of visits to Pop Parade witnessed a steady and dramatic decline, hitting its lowest level of 40 thousand on day 7. Meanwhile, the turns of access to Music Choice hit the bottom level of 20 thousand on days 2 and 4 and fluctuated around this level until day 11.
Visits to Pop Parade skyrocketed from just above 40 thousand on day 9 to 150 thousand on day 11 before undergoing a nearly twofold fall two days later. Pop Parade was overtaken by Music Choice, whose statistics steeply climbed to 120 thousand on day 12 and peaked at 130 thousands two days later. However, Pop Parade soon regained its leading position as the visits it received topped at over 160 thousand on the final day of the period while the figure for Music Choice was only 60 thousand the same day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-09 | hainammai0991@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music web sites Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 95
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music web sites Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58653846154 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33887189593 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.79127472 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121317021225 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738464583325 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699210336999 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110084143118 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084583268727 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.