The government investment in Arts music and theatre is waste of money governments should invest this fund in public services instead.
To
what extent do you agree with this statement?
In this 21st century, the pivotal role has been played by the government to run the country. It is waste of money to invest in arts, music and theater, however, authors ought to spend these financial funds in public services instead of theater and so on. I partially agree with this given statement.
On one hand, population has been booming by leaps and bounds and people are becoming modern. All generations of mankinds have interest to watch movies in cinema - where they can watch films for getting entertainment, listening songs, some people have different skills, they utilize as a profession : sketch artists, musicians, painters, dancers and many more. There are humongous benefits of theatre, arts and music. For an example, the U.S.A - United States of America where 25% people are earning money from film industry, some skills use to earn. These are the elements, which not only gain income of the people but also income of the government, when any art of film sell to another country.
On the other hand, it is sine-qua-non for the authors to provide better kind of facilities to the public : good transportation system - to travel fast and safe; hospital - to provide better medical treatment schools - to provide education to the children, who are the future of the nation if they are intelligent the country will be prosperous. It is very benignent for the nation. For an instance, if the government provides free education, it assists to reduce the rate of uneducated people and rate of unemployment as well, if gives good medical service, it decline the death rate of nation also increase national income from public transportation.
To conclude, it is essential for the authors to invest money upon both public services as well as theatres, music and arts because all things are beneficial for humans and country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-06 | MAHAMMAD FAIZ FIROZBHAI VHORA | 67 | view |
| 2020-07-06 | faisal vhora | 67 | view |
- cutting down tree is real environment threat yes this is still happening at a great rate around the world why do you think forests are being destroyed are there benefits from the destruction of forest 11
- Full time university students spend a lot of time studying however they should perform other activities too To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Doctors nurses and teachers make a great contribution to society and should be paid more than entertainment and sports celebrities Do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by In two countries 89
- People Who Read For Pleasure Develop Their Imagination More And Acquire Better Language Skills Compared To People Who Prefer Watching Television Agree Disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...arts and music. For an example, the U.S.A - United States of America where 25% pe...
^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...g money from film industry, some skills use to earn. These are the elements, which ...
^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
...well, if gives good medical service, it decline the death rate of nation also increase ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... invest money upon both public services as well as theatres, music and arts because all th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03289473684 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69129719899 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588815789474 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.1607299014 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206513390084 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811081743559 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872457910893 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154123290882 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141760177112 0.056905535591 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.