Some cultures think old people are of higher value than the youth, while other cultures value the youth more. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The social fabric of a society is built with the right blend of both the old and younger generations. Many cultures seem to prefer the young blood, however, many others, credit the older generations with a higher value. While both factions have positive and negative aspects, in my opinion, it is the youth that are incidental to any nation's true value.
Firstly, the significant worldly experience garnered by the older generation, is undoubtedly priceless. In most cases, seniors have gone through multiple upheavals of a growing economy and have witnessed the various ebbs and flows. Hence, they are regarded to be in respectable stature to further guide the younger generation, with a long-term view. To illustrate with an example, it is this precise reason why many countries prefer to elect a senior, more experienced and much wiser political leader, to lead the nations' development.
On the other hand, the rapid pace with which technology is fundamentally transforming the world, it truly benefits paying heed to the youth. Not only do youngsters contribute a higher tax and drive up the consumerism, but also are the early adopters of the latest technologies. In addition, they are adept at combining the age-old knowledge and experience of the seniors, with the latest tech tools. Thus, utilizing advanced software and AI, as the perfect blend of traditional heritage values and tech powered future. For example, countries like India are appointing younger ministers to their government offices to benefit from their tech mindsets. Furthermore, many business houses have given the reign to the younger stalwarts to drive the organizations to even greater heights.
To conclude, despite the varied benefits that accompany the older generation citizens, I agree that youngsters contribute more value to any society. It is therefore imperative, that all nations where only the word of elderlies is valued, should incorporate the viewpoints and suggestions of the youngsters as well.
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped Discuss both views 84
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped Discuss both views 84
- In developing countries Some people believe that their government should introduce new technology to people in order to improve their quality of life Others believe that offering free education would be more advantageous in the long term Discuss both thes 84
- In developing countries Some people believe that their government should introduce new technology to people to improve their quality of life Others believe that offering free education would be more advantageous in the long term Discuss both these views a 84
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped Discuss both views 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...uch wiser political leader, to lead the nations development. On the other hand, the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in most cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34603174603 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88462270028 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606349206349 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1687400559 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.266666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136324358572 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386459304506 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042328644747 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777162508813 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570325533976 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.