In companies, promotions to higher positions should always be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring.
What is your opinion on this?
Recruitment plays a vital role to Human Resource of an organization. It is commonly believed that the advancement should give to an internal staff instead of a new talent from outside. In my opinion, the enlistment must choose based on the best interest of the company.
It is understandable why many people argue that an in-house employee must have priority for a promotion to higher positive. The first obvious for that is familiar with the general working of the business. For instance, a person who has a long-working time in the company, they absolutely would have many experience and must-have skills in work. Therefore, they totally could accomplished the work and solve the problems in the most effective way. Secondly, it is unnecessary to vocational training for an insider. This is because the promotion often is given to a person who has the positive lower a level than the positive that company need. For example, an assistance manager have more likely to become a manager than others who have the lower positive. Accordingly, they have chances to get used to the job and know how the company operated it. Moreover, it is also created the motivate for people, giving them positive reasons for working hard.
On the other hand, I think that the most deserving candidate should hired. The reason for that the recruit from external sources is expensive. An outsider may offer a lot of new ideas into a company, however that organization has to pay advertising fees from online recruiting sites, social media sites, magazines or newspapers. In addition, if an inside employee is not qualified and talented that get promoted, leading a competition between staff members. This is because some people think that they deserve to achieved the higher positive.
Personally believe that inside or outside employees should get equal opportunity to a vacant high-level positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-09 | phuong dieu | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Puneetrai | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e why many people argue that an in-house employee must have priority for a promot...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the company, they absolutely would have many experience and must-have skills in ...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'accomplish'
Suggestion: accomplish
... in work. Therefore, they totally could accomplished the work and solve the problems in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 880, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...erated it. Moreover, it is also created the motivate for people, giving them positive reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10355987055 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80454650353 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569579288026 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0425624 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6111111111 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72222222222 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168665896239 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494875977896 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638843768944 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959202277837 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265584925444 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.