Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is indispensable that wild animals are on the verge of extinction. While it is argued by some people that we should save all wild animals, others think that only some of them need to protected. This essay will highlight both sides of arguments. However, in my opinion, I believe that we should protect all wild animals.
On the one hand, some people have a flawed assumption on saving only a few endangered species. First and foremost, preserving all animals can cost a lot of money as it requires foods and natural resources for saving animals. Since many countries are still suffering from starvation and clean water. So, is it worth to spend money on animals? Another is, few species of animals provide raw materials for making luxury products such as leather jackets, bags and belts. Hence, saving some of them would be beneficial to us. For instance, crocodiles for leather products and wild elephants for their tusks. Thus, some people think that we should protect only those animals which are useful for fulfilling human’s needs.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why we should protect all wild animals. Firstly, they are part of our ecosystem. If any species are wiped out, then it would impact whole eco-life cycle. Therefore, it is necessary to protect all animals species as they all are inter-connected with each other. Secondly, if we build natural habitats for some species, that ultimately provides shelter to many other animals. As a result, we should look at the bigger picture in terms of saving all animals rather than focus on merely on specific species. It is a win-win situation for us. Moreover, all animals play a significant role in supporting our biodiversity. So, we cannot able to decide that some species are more important than others.
In conclusion, although people are divided on their opinions regarding protecting will animals, I consider that we should put adequate efforts to to save all the wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-11 | Keyur Patel6055 | 48 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | seame | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that economic development is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others argue that economic development is damaging the environment and needs to stop Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour Therefore working hours should be reduced To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 61
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f extinction. While it is argued by some people that we should save all wild anim...
^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cost a lot of money as it requires foods and natural resources for saving animals...
^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other is, few species of animals provide raw materials for making luxury products...
^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ny species are wiped out, then it would affect whole eco-lifecycle. Therefore, it is necessa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...erefore, it is necessary to protect all animals species as they all are inter-connected...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he bigger picture in terms of saving all animals rather than focus on merely on s...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pecies are more important than others. In conclusion, although people are divid...
^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...der that we should put adequate efforts to to save all the wild animals.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01533742331 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6287985623 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0099159507 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3181818182 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8181818182 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.31818181818 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377593371824 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108663161772 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937030625952 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256849960909 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723700478912 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.