In globalization, it is impossible to succeed if you cannot speak a foreign language. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "in globalization, it is impossible to succeed if you cannot speak a foreign language" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that globalization might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that speaking a foreign language can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the ability to speak a foreign language in globalization can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that being familiar with other cultures and learning their languages are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of being a bilingual person in globalization. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both learning a foreign language and better public relationships distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of speaking a foreign language might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of job opportunities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of globalization can relate to the reality that the demerits of a global language can pertain to learning English. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of difficulties of learning foreign languages were correlated positively with more income, the local authorities would ultimately address the effects of speaking a foreign language. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of finding a suitable position.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the ability to speak a foreign language in globalization far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-28 | sattar_iust | 62 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after in was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same tow periods Summari 73
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in to of the years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 56
- Business and commercial organizations should help to solve environmental challenges To what extent do you agree with this opinion 88
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77516778523 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38772807349 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.4755314644 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.454545455 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29577650841 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101804212349 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813793866604 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172106456536 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061537243902 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.