Are government doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, sustaining a healthy lifestyle play a vital role in people's lives. In this connection, there are several avenues, which inform people how to improve their health. Although contested by many that the matter of governments' activities to educate people to consider the significance of consuming nutritious food is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that governments do not provide insight into healthy eating effectively, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, people suffer from health problems more than before, so it indicates that governments are not successful in educating people to have a healthy diet. To be more specific, increasing the rate of obesity and diabetes among children and adults shows they do not familiar with the importance of healthy food. For example, my mother has been a teacher for twenty years, and she meets many fat pupils more than the past. Moreover, she mentions that children prefer junk food which includes sugar and fat, and their parents do not limit the consumption of unhealthy food. Otherwise, they bring food that contains vitamins and proteins. As a result, most of the students are under-treated stemming from their poor food consumption.
Second, nowadays, there are many fast-food restaurants in a city, which show that governments do not decrease the tendency of people to eating unhealthy food. To elucidate, a few years ago, there were fewer fast-food restaurants in a city than the current time because people's inclinations were healthy food made at home with fresh materials. According to my own experience, when I was an elementary student, there were two pizza restaurants near our home; however, there are innumerable of them now. My parents did not allow me to eat fast food more that one time a month, but I eat hamburgers and hotdogs three times a week. If governments taught people an essential role of nutrition and minerals in their diet, their preference for unhealthy food would become low.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that governments do not educate people to eat healthy food. Not only do people deal with health problems which are related to unhealthy eating habits, but they also tend to eat fast food as many restaurants are opened.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People would meet many problems in their daily life and they would solve them by themselves or from the help of their families help from the government is not necessary 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded and bad people are punished 93
- Celebrities such as actors musicians and athletes etc sometimes express their political views in public Some people appreciate knowing the political views of celebrities others think it is not appropriate or useful to know the political views of celebriti 76
- For the students ages 5 10 it is better to take a break for every one hour of instruction or let them focus on lessons for a longer period of time 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 770, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce for unhealthy food would become low. To conclude, while there are several arg...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15404040404 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80125410099 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55303030303 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0500633969 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.058823529 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38831497091 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127590342489 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879497881457 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261259157255 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492465507213 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.