The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
[Specific Task Instruction: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.]
Teaching is a tricky and meaningful pursuit because all the young kids growing up need good guidance in order to grown into responsible human beings and cultivated citizens so they can not only realize their own dreams but also contribute to the society and to make the world a better place. The statement argues that the best way of teaching is to praise positive behaviors while ignoring negative ways. While praising good behavior will increase a person’s good behaviors in the future, I disagree with the belief that negative behaviors should be ignore. Instead, I argue that the best way of teaching is to praise positive behaviors while recognizing negative behaviors in people and tell them why their actions are good or bad. Let me explain why.
Firstly, praising good behaviors will lead to more positive behaviors but ignoring bad behaviors would hamper people’s healthy personal development. Positive behaviors are defined as merits like respect, inclusiveness, hard-working, honesty, kindness, being on time and so on, all of which would do good both to oneself and others. Negative behaviors like procrastination, infidelity, cheating, plagiarism, bullying, malicious derision, disrespect, and so on are deleterious aspects that not only harm oneself but also hurt others.
For school teachers, they not only should praise students’ good behaviors in order to encourage them to do more good things in class and outside school, but also pay attention to mistakes they have made. However small as procrastination or large as plagiarism, no one should ignore the impact a bad behavior can cause. If a teacher only praises a student without telling him/her what he/she has not done right, his/her bad behaviors would offset his/her merits since bad behaviors lead to more bad behaviors. If a student is joyful and often bring happiness to people around him/her, teachers should encourage him/her to continue doing so. But what if this student cheated in exams? Should teachers ignore this infringement of school integrity and still praise the student? Of course not. Since the student has violated school rules, it is ultimately right to alarm the student of his/her mistakes in cheating. Sometimes, punishment for the student like writing a reflection paper or giving an F to the student for a class he/she cheated on is needed because punishment can help the student recognize the consequence of his/her violation, thus decreasing the chance of him/her cheating again. Furthermore, teachers should articulate why cheating is bad in school and outside school when the student graduates - cheating violates school rules, makes other students feel unfair about exams, set negative examples for students, and even harms one’s mental health and lead to a deceitful personality. Only by recognizing the bad consequences of cheating can a student learn from the mistakes he/she has made and to avoid making that same mistake again. Thus, teachers should alarm a person when he/she has a negative behavior while recognizing his/her good behaviors.
Secondly, while praising can help people feel good about themselves, ignoring bad behaviors would lead to unexpected outcomes that would have detrimental effect on people’s lives and even the society. When a good behavior is encouraged, more people tend to engage in doing good deeds to people around them. However, if a bad action is ignored, one who has done something bad will continue harming oneself and others without an end, leading to accumulated detrimental effects. Once there was a kid name Freak who was once a good person but became a robber when he was 20. How could this happen? So, when he was 6, he stole some pencils from a local store because his family was poor so he could save money. While recognizing the good behavior that Freak wanted to save some money, their parents failed to tell Freak that stealing was bad. Later, when Freak stole food from local supermarkets, their parents still praised Freak’s so-called “frugal” behaviors while ignoring what bad consequences stealing could do to Freak. This accumulated harmful praise and ignorance of bad conducts led Freak to believe that stealing was advantageous, so he one day arranged a gang to rob a local bank. He was unfortunately caught by the police and sent to jail. When his parents were crying, Freak was angry. He said to his parents that “why didn’t you punish me when I first stole pencils back then? Otherwise I wouldn’t know that stealing would be caught until now!!” But everything was late even though their parents finally realized that stealing, as a negative behavior, could not be tolerated and they instead should cultivate good behaviors while telling their kids that he should never conduct bad things again. From this anecdote, I advocate for the equal attention toward good and bad behaviors.
In conclusion, I disagree with the statement that negative behaviors ought be ignore. Conversely, I argue that, the best way of teaching is to praise good behaviors while recognizing bad behaviors so people, no longer kids or adults, would never do bad things again. If teachers can narrate why good things are helpful and bad things are detrimental, kids and adults would benefit more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 551, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ignored'?
Suggestion: ignored
...elief that negative behaviors should be ignore. Instead, I argue that the best way of ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1388, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...e when I first stole pencils back then? Otherwise I wouldn’t know that stealing would be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 70, Rule ID: OUGHT_SAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ought to be'?
Suggestion: ought to be
...h the statement that negative behaviors ought be ignore. Conversely, I argue that, the b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 32.0 12.4196629213 258% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 85.0 33.0505617978 257% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4414.0 2235.4752809 197% => OK
No of words: 851.0 442.535393258 192% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18683901293 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.40110213675 4.55969084622 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69563098634 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 365.0 215.323595506 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428907168038 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1326.6 704.065955056 188% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.10617977528 419% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 37.0 20.2370786517 183% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.875768288 60.3974514979 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.297297297 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94594594595 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 23.0 5.13820224719 448% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11462573877 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373550185418 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522040794754 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841820279099 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484745196662 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 167.0 100.480337079 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.