Some people believe that only employees who have worked at a company for a long time deserve to be promoted to a higher position. What is your opinion about this?
Career promotions to higher positions in their company hierarchy are expected by anyone as a human being. However, some people believe that, higher positions are deserved by the employees who have worked for a long time for the company. But in my opinion, promotions should be based on the true capabilities and potential to align with company strategies, instead of mere long term experience within the company.
To begin with, work experience can definitely create maturity in a subject area. Long term working in same place enables more understanding on the business and the teammates, who are working within the divisions and cross divisions. However, with the time and personal responsibilities, these people like to play in comfortable zone and can negatively influence the attitudes of the others such as direct subordinates. For example, due to the reluctant to change the current practices, people will trend to float on same boat rather than accepting new responsibilities or adapting to new processes or systems.
On the other hand, creativity and the energy is abundant in young blood. Therefore, they can bring innovative ideas thinking out of the box and are able to lead new concepts actively. Further, people who have a wide range of experiences with different company’s and cultures can provide novel inputs and insights to improve the business processes. For example, a person who have worked for a multinational company might have been exposed to advanced work processes than who are continuously working in a local company. Consequently, new faces not only can have potential on productivity improvement, but also introduce competitions among the other for individual improvements.
Considering above factors, long time experience in the same place can not prove to significantly impact a business success. Instead, capabilities and leadership potential within the employees are to be taken into account for the promotions to have a sustainable business development.
- some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- You recently did a short cookery course The cookery school asked for your feedback on this course Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school In your letter describe what you enjoyed about the course say how much cooking you ve done since 73
- Some people believe that it is best to do the same type of work throughout your life Others feel that it is beneficial to change jobs often Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The youth crime rate is rising rapidly in many countries What are the reasons for this trend What can parents and teachers do to solve it 69
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4115755627 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12015424901 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6193881958 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368876649562 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119996809393 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127665397151 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230331954518 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133133602105 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4115755627 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12015424901 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553054662379 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6193881958 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368876649562 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119996809393 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127665397151 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230331954518 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133133602105 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.