Which one do you prefer? students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class.
In this sophisticated world in which we live, education and related topics are in the main focus of parents and teachers' attention. The teaching styles which determine the efficacy of learning is one of the most important items in this field. While some believe that students at high school should listen to their teachers all time and attempt to absorb lessons, others disagree. Based on my experiences, high school pupils benefit a lot if they participate in the class actively and involve with the lectures as much as they can. I will elaborate on my reasons in the following essay.
First, communicating in class is the best way to increase students' attention to the lesson. Involving with the lecture while teachers are talking is the first and foremost step of learning, and it needs that students concentrate on the teachers' talking and think meticolously. When student want to share their idea with class, they try to understand the topic as much as they can, which is the object of class, then they will use their intellectual abilities to prepare their ideas and deliver in a well-suited way to grab the teacher and other peers heed. I remember when I was student in high school whenever teachers let us to participate with the topic, I not only listened to our teacher eagerly but also I focus on speaking skills to make the best speech in front of others. Therefore, this communicatng opportunity help me to learn lessons throughly.
Second, participating to the dialogue and sharing ideas provide student with a wonderful chance to improve thier communication skills. While a student starts to speak in front of other classmate gradually he becomes more confident and can talk infront of more audiences. Since students are our prespective leaders and managers, they need to improve their interpersonal communication skills such as; speaking and controlling of body language, and so on. I remember, at junior year in my high school our art teacher gave us some lectures about the verbal and non-verbal language communication. Then, he wanted all students in class to share their ideas about topics in all sessions considering all those hints. When I went to college, where many of classes were discussion-based, I did not encounter with a big problems about talking in front teachers and classmates.
In conclusion, contemplating all the reasons and details mentiones above, I am of the opinion that students should be allowed to contribute their thought with class. This is because they will learn better when they want to talk about the topic. Moreover, students will experience who speak in front of others which is a needed skill whether they go college or not. We should consider this approach even in elementary and middle school since it has myriad benefits for students.
- When you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used for example donate money on food or service or advertisement for organizations or leave the decision to the organizations 42
- tpo 30- independent 3
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive 80
- People should be realistic rather than romantic in order to live a better life Do you agree or disagree with the statement Use specific reasons to support your answer 73
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this sophisticated world in which we ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...education and related topics are in the main focus of parents and teachers attention. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on my reasons in the following essay. First, communicating in class is the bes...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 501, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a well-suited way" with adverb for "well-suited"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ties to prepare their ideas and deliver in a well-suited way to grab the teacher and other peers hee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty help me to learn lessons throughly. Second, participating to the dialogue an...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...n-based, I did not encounter with a big problems about talking in front teachers and cla...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in front teachers and classmates. In conclusion, contemplating all the rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... class. This is because they will learn better when they want to talk about the topic....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01290322581 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81241158441 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522580645161 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6738591386 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.55 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328035596628 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966918907141 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544804522067 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216986956016 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568792659127 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.