Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead, they should spend the money on housing and road development. To what extent do you agree?
These days, most countries have shown great concern about the issues related to the building. Controversy exists as to whether the government should stop investing money in the restoration of ancient buildings to give more funds for constructing houses and improving the quality of roads. From my perspective, I am utterly convinced that money should be paid for the development of housing and road rather than the reconstruction of the old buildings.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this opinion is that in this day and age, many people over the world face up with the risk of being homeless after disasters. This is shown by the following example. A ferocious explosion tore through the Lebanese capital on August 4 in 2020, damaging more than 70,000 houses and leaving some 300,000 homeless people. Therefore, it is obvious that the government should spend funds on rebuilding houses for citizens rather than repairing the old constructions.
In addition, another point to support this view is that the quality of roads closely attributed to the injury related to traffic accidents. One example to demonstrate this opinion is that in 2018, 63,194 people had died and 258,532 people had been wounded in traffic accidents in China, seeing a growth compared to the previous year. When looking into this problem, people found that the primary reason for this consequence was the unregulated road works and a lack of road facilities to control the vehicles stream. For this reason, if roads are not improved in the right way, the figure for fatality will continue increasing.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that the necessity of spending money on housing and road development is an undisputed, which is much more essential than the renovation of the old buildings.
- The plans below show the changes of the particular area from 1965 to the present day and plans also give a description of proposed changes Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- In countries where the unemployment rates are high most pupils should be offered only primary education there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding jobs Do you agree or disagree 89
- The government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children rather than on professional sports and art performance for the general public To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that secondary or high school students should be taught money management because it is an important life skill Do you agree or disagree with the statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ted to the building. Controversy exists as to whether the government should stop investing mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, therefore, as to, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14189189189 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78056754642 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3186596974 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252315613726 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863245088764 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837533665773 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160020515409 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673810994673 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.