In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, whiles others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.
Discuss both view and give your opinion.
There are some nations that a small number of people are paid with extremely high salaries. While those supporting this ideas, including myself, claim that this benefits those countries, objectors to this hold that there should be a wage ceiling to control the amount that a person can receive from his or her job.
The two of many reasons that many countries accept enormous salaries paid for some employees are improvement of the ability to attract talents and increase in the amount of tax paid by high income taxpayers. Nowadays, it is widely acknowledged that the amount of money someone earns is the measure to his or her success. Therefore, a huge number of talented people tend to choose the highest paying job they are offered to fulfill their desire to be successful and glorious in other peoples’ eyes. In addition, in most of the countries in the world, the higher income a person receive, the higher percentage of tax he or she has to pay. As a result, governments are more likely to collect more tax from these people to redistribute this amount of budget to society.
On the other hand, those opposed to unlimited pay for staff in companies hold that the maximum remuneration should be regulated in order to better reduce the wealth gap in the society. According to the research published in The Economist in this month, extreme distinction between the asset of the richest and of the poorest in a country contributes to generate the dissatisfaction towards the government and expected strikes, which can cost businesses and the country billions of dollars per year. Moreover, if companies do not spend too much capital on payment for some employees, they will have more financial resources to increase salaries for the workers who receive insufficient pays.
In conclusion, although a country allowing companies to remunerate as much money as they can for their personnel can attract more talents and enlarge its national budget from tax imposed on high-income people, restricting the limit of salary can contribute to narrow the difference in the income of the rich and the poor.
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many people think that to become a successful specialist it s better to choose a career early in life and never change it later To what extent do you agree with this view Support your opinion with relevant examples 44
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behaviour What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 73
- Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
There are some nations that a small number of people are paid with extremely high sal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y high salaries. While those supporting this ideas, including myself, claim that thi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97159090909 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71636074601 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536931818182 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4872698602 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.090909091 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325995074074 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109576640029 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429339821874 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183274554902 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414215049463 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.