Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, governments have made efforts to allocate money to different aspects of society. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among managers is allocating budget. Opinions are divided into whether it is indispensable for athletes to receive financial help, or artists should be prioritized. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that, although the value of art should be respected, supporting athletes is of great importance. There are several reasons to support this, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, without a shadow of a doubt, people will be motivated to participate in various sports activities that eventually enhance peoples' both physical and mental health. In other words, by providing youths with a well-equipped spacious, where adolescents can exercise and do not remain dormant, they will put their heart and soul in their favorite field and avoid a precarious situation such as committing a crime. Therefore, young people, who are the potentials of one country, are going to prosper appropriately. To be more specific, a couple of years ago. Governments decided to establish a stadium for local people, where they can not only observe competitions but also playing football and running. In consequence, after almost a year, most of the teenagers from that area joined international teams, which was an honor for their families. Had investors not removed the barrier of deficiency, our young people would have thrived in sports.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that although monetary support seems unconvincing, the results of this investment is remarkable for all the people as well as governments. Flourishing and nurturing athletes will make them competent, and as a result, other countries want them to work with them; moreover, possessing brand-new equipment and facilities make a country to be the candidate of hosting for international events. In consequence, the country would not suffer from a stagnant economy.
As a case in point, in the aforementioned situation, one of my friends who own a hotel made a lot of money because a national event was held in that area and that city was inundated with numerous people.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that governments should finance sportsmen. The fact that it will persuade youths to take part in sports, coupled with the fact that the country also benefits from that, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, while, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18072289157 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97061233902 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58313253012 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3532399343 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0555555556 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143471867052 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409264423446 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438720217913 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074170541091 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501650204791 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.