The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented maps illustrate how Grange Park, which is located between Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street, has been changed since 1920, when it was opened for visitors.
Overall, there are too many changes, which happened in the park. The most noticeable ones are the appearance of underground car park for visitors and an amphitheatre for concerts.
Firstly, it can be observed that the amount of rose gardens were decreased. Besides, roses garden, which is situated on the left of entrance to Arnold Avenue, continues to be there. The garden on the opposite side of this entrance was changed by a cafe. The fountain in the center of the park was demolished and replaced by the new large rose garden with seats.
Further, the changes regarded the glasshouse, instead of it there is a water feature. In addition, a children's play zone appeared on the place, where the pond for water plants was. Moreover, the amphitheatre replaced the stage for musicians and the main innovation is the car park under the Grange Park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-22 | GAUTAM KAMRA | 84 | view |
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- All criminals should have access to education and rehabilitation programs while in prison To what extent do you agree or disagree on this IELTS topic 78
- Some people believe that spoken communication is more powerful than written communication Do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an amphitheatre for concerts. Firstly, it can be observed that the amount of ro...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the glasshouse, instead of it there is a water feature. In addition, a children...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56731968027 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1467582503 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136002933424 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514503242772 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531077437715 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888693767425 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376650872529 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.