Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want. Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children. Others think the opposite.
What’s your opinion?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, parents' behavior with children can shape their personalities. In this connection, parents try different avenues to educate their children. Although contested by many that the matter of giving weekly money to children is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that it can be a plus when children have weekly money to buy their objects, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, by giving weekly money to children, they learn how to manage it for one week to buy whatever they want. To be more specific, children understand how to spend their money in a week without finishing when they learn how to save it for crucial situations and do not allocate it to unessential objects. According to my own experience, when I was a kid, my mother gave me money every week. One day, I spent my weekly money on buying an expensive doll on the first day of one week, so I did not have enough money for the rest of the week, thereby asking my mom to give me more money; however, she did not accept my request. As a result, I could not deal with my financial expenses and could not afford any things, which convince me to stay at home all week, leading to learning money management.
Second, if children become responsible for buying their things, they will understand the worth of money. To elucidate, when parents pay for children's stuff, they cannot realize how much money they should spend on objects, so they did not reduce their expenses. For example, my father bought whatever my sister needed; therefore, she did not understand the price of them. One day, my father was busy buying her things, so she bought books and pens herself, which informed her about the price of objects. Moreover, she has realized that my father should work hard to fulfill her requirements because inflation increases significantly. Accordingly, she has felt regretful, which has lead her to decrease her demands.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that giving weekly money to children has several advantages. Not only do they learn how to manage their money, but they also understand the value of money.
- Which of the following three ways do you think would be most effective in protecting the natural environment and why Walking or cycling instead of using cars Recycling and reusing objects instead of throwing them in the trash Buying organic and chemical f 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes people think nowadays the media TV newspaper Internet are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past and the incorrect information may cause more problems for the public 76
- Grades encourage students to work harder at school Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds 76
- new teaching method professor record a video lecture in advance for students to learn class time used to answer questions and have discussions Do you think this is an effective way and why 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86734693878 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65451294662 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515306122449 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0813968718 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.235294118 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0588235294 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320104214641 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126862716457 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837732739039 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225224272006 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055839255441 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.