Some people today feel that their country should refrain from accepting large numbers of im-migrants. However, others believe that taking in individuals from other countries is the right thing to do. What is your opinion on this issue?
Globalization has made the world a smaller place and enabled people to settle down in desired country. Whether countries should open up for migrants or avoid migration has been debatable since the turn of the century. I believe that a calculated invitation to applicants who could bene-fit in growth of a country is one of the best approach. In this essay I will discuss both the views with examples of the United States of America and a report from the International employment association to support my ideas.
Many countries are built on the services of immigrants. The primary example of this is the USA. It has been observed that current population of United States comprises of 75 % immi-grants underlining the role played in prosperiety of the country. The diversity of population brings new skills, experiences and also extra zeal to succeed. In addition to this, it also provides opportunities to those who are deprived of resources to succeed in life. To illustrate this, many West European countries offer permanent residency to individuals who invest more that 2 mil-lion USD in their country , a mutually beneficial deal. Therefore we can conclusively state that inviting candidates who can improve country’s economy or reputation is a step in the right di-rection.
On the contrary, it is argued by some that allowing migrants into their country will hamper op-portunities to local people. The central reason for this is two fold, primarily, local jobs will be taken away by immigrants. There is a strong case for growing unemployment among native cit-izens where the immigration numbers are high. It is believed that the poor of the country are effected with many jobs given away to migrants at lower wages. Secondly, cultural differences. The clash of culture between two ethnicities often hamper harmony of the state or a country that could undermine and destroy economic and political institutions. For example, a report from IEA states that there is a direct correlation of unemployment rate and immigration percentage. Thus it is possible to say that there are justified reasons to argue against immigration policies.
To sum it up, although there is a case for disharmony and growing unemployment by immi-grants which can be mitigated and in some cases prevented by stringent laws, I suppose deserv-ing and eligible immigrants have to allowed for betterment of country and making world a bet-ter place to live in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-25 | ghostwriter | 84 | view |
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people s lives Others think that adult life brings more happiness in spite of greater responsibilities Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Today people think that attraction of foreign investment is necessary and important for the development of the economies of the host countries while the others think that attraction of foreign investment has negative impact on the society and not only on 78
- Write a letter to your manager about your work from last year Include What you did What you think you could improve A training request 73
- People who buy friendly vehicles like electric cars should receive a subsidy on tax This will discourage people from buying polluting cars and thus lower emissions Do you agree or disagree with the statement 63
- You recently visited a place that had a strong impact on you Now you want to write to your friend about the place Write a letter to a friend about the place In your letter explain where the place was and how you got there describe what you saw offer to ta 82
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...hat current population of United States comprises of 75 % immi-grants underlining the role p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 591, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ore that 2 mil-lion USD in their country , a mutually beneficial deal. Therefore w...
^^
Line 2, column 622, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r country , a mutually beneficial deal. Therefore we can conclusively state that inviting...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oyment rate and immigration percentage. Thus it is possible to say that there are ju...
^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some cases prevented by stringent laws, I suppose deserv-ing and eligible immigr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i suppose, in addition, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16161616162 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99777279851 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0553130951 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191325278628 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051752828799 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413269857832 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107110172875 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381510187951 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...hat current population of United States comprises of 75 % immi-grants underlining the role p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 591, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ore that 2 mil-lion USD in their country , a mutually beneficial deal. Therefore w...
^^
Line 2, column 622, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r country , a mutually beneficial deal. Therefore we can conclusively state that inviting...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oyment rate and immigration percentage. Thus it is possible to say that there are ju...
^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some cases prevented by stringent laws, I suppose deserv-ing and eligible immigr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i suppose, in addition, in some cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16161616162 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99777279851 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0553130951 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191325278628 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051752828799 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413269857832 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107110172875 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381510187951 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.