Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while others think that television is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In today’s world, most countries have shown great concern about the news. When this issue comes into view, there exist many conflicting opinions. Some people strongly agree that the best way to gain news is using radio. Meanwhile, others share the view that television is better for this purpose. Both of the views have their own merits which require careful consideration.
On the one hand, some people are of the view that radio is the most suitable way to gain news. One explanation to support this view is that radios are prevail used which allows people to get news when travelling. This is because radios are installed in almost car and public transportation, which can help people also update news when moving. This is shown by the following example. According to the result of Media Post newly-researched survey, an average 9 in 10 commuters listen to traditional AM or FM radio when they are in their car or in their way to work. As a result, radio is more beneficial than television in this field.
On the other hand, some people argue that television is more appropriate for this aim than radio. The most frequent factor contributing to this view is that the channels on television are obviously divided, which relies on the fixed themes. Therefore, it is easy for people using this technology to search for the news needed. For example, in Vietnam, ANTV channel gives that news related to the security, while VTV3 channel is about the entertainment and the show of celebrities or VTV7 presents the issues regarding to education and so on. As this illustration have shown, it is clear that channels on TV are separated in a specific way, while channels on radio are not. For this reason, television is a better choice than radio to this extend.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that both radio and television bring their peculiar positive impacts on the way to update news, which cannot be denied. However, from my point of view, I am utterly convinced that TV is a better method than radio.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | riyapatel30 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | riyapatel30 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | lhm.ils | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-25 | lhm.ils | 73 | view |
- Compare the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe in the era of e technology printing newspapers and magazines will cease to occur in the near future To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities such as the environment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevailed'.
Suggestion: prevailed
...to support this view is that radios are prevail used which allows people to get news wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific way" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...clear that channels on TV are separated in a specific way, while channels on radio are not. For t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81948424069 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65200139265 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510028653295 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0960296829 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5263157895 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401137208018 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138013678035 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756856847576 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251554856518 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610184356831 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.