Smart car
Both the passage and lecture discuss driverless cars, a very exciting yet controversial topic. Based on the reading arguments, non-driver cars may have several benefits compared to conventional ones, which primarily include higher levels of driving safety, lesser amount of exhaust fumes, and saving time while driving. However, the lecturer stated some of the weaknesses of such smart vehicles that cast serious doubts about its apparently undeniable benefits.
First of all, the safety issue of current cars is not completely relieved by computer driven automobiles. Since computer programs are produced by human programmers, no software is absolutely perfect and error-proof. Thus, inevitable software errors may lead to even larger catastrophes. For example, the car mentioned in the reading had recently had a head-on crash, after a 700,000 miles of non-accident drive. This showed that artificial intelligence cannot be reliable, as it is claimed by the passage.
Moreover, the lecturer mentioned that a driverless car could be used by any person with any level of driving skills. As a matter of fact, having no age restriction on obtaining the permission to ride a car will result in an increased number of cars on the roads. Because of that, the overall amount of air pollution by cars will eventually elevate. Therefore, any reduction in air pollution due to smoothly proceeding traffic of driverless cars, which is claimed by the reading, will be annulled.
At the end, it is brought to attention by the lecturer that driving is a legitimate excuse for being off the stressful chores of a full work day. By having a smart car at service, people find extra time to become more involved in their responsibilities and job affairs than now. So, the time saved by the driverless car will not be a relaxing advantage anymore. This undermines the passage argument that states that smart cars help people to benefit from their relaxing non-driving time on their vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Julie.Zhu | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | villian7 | 75 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
- visula spatial intelligence 78
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. “According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 75
- integrated task 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Advertising influences people s behavior in a negative way use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 75
- Some People like Doing Work By Hand. Others Prefer Using Machines. Which Do You Prefer? Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer. 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e driving. However, the lecturer stated some of the weaknesses of such smart vehicles that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...However, the lecturer stated some of the weaknesses of such smart vehicles that c...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar at service, people find extra time to become more involved in their responsibi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22257053292 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87613412115 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605015673981 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0931412286 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313166369038 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090644207354 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828909446844 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172224027481 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641127232386 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e driving. However, the lecturer stated some of the weaknesses of such smart vehicles that...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...However, the lecturer stated some of the weaknesses of such smart vehicles that c...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar at service, people find extra time to become more involved in their responsibi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22257053292 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87613412115 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605015673981 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0931412286 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313166369038 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090644207354 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828909446844 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172224027481 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641127232386 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.