Some people think that it is beneficial for children to do paid work, while others think that it can be harmful for children.
Do you think that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Although many people argue that paid work is advantageous for children, other people consider that it is detrimental for children. In my opinion, I think that paid work can bring more drawbacks than any positive impact it have on children.
Admittedly, there are some basic benefit that paid work has on children. Firstly, it teaches children about the value of money. Students get to know that money doesn’t come from tree and they have to work hard for earning it. Secondly, another basic advantage that it have on children is that children learn to manage money in an effective way. With limited amount of income from work, children have to meet their high demand which requires managing of money in effective way. Limited amount of income gives them the opportunity to manage the money in an effective way.
Nevertheless, despite the basic benefit it students could face serious drawback when doing paid work. On side of issue is that children are exposed to the child labor. Since children who are doing child work are not protected by labor law, the employer can pay them less than their counterparts while doing the same amount of work. Another side of the issue is that it distracts their academic life. Students have to do multiple task at a time and as a result they are unable to concentrate on their academic life hence they cut a sorry figure in the exam.
To conclude, being exploited at the workplace and struggling in academic life outweighs any of the benefit that paid work has on children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-05 | Kawsar Ahmed | 56 | view |
- In order study at the university students are required to extensive tuition fees Not all the students can afford them so some people think that university education should be free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- One of the consequence of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar chart provides information about percentage of divorce in Finland and Sweden between 2011 to 2015 11
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the main causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest Write at least 250 words 73
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse i 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...e drawbacks than any positive impact it have on children. Admittedly, there are so...
^^^^
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... is that children learn to manage money in an effective way. With limited amount of income from wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hem the opportunity to manage the money in an effective way. Nevertheless, despite the basic bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, i think, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80842911877 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44409610893 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2166665813 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6428571429 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358523864019 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121966505915 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968436881803 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225368424583 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113039947904 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...e drawbacks than any positive impact it have on children. Admittedly, there are so...
^^^^
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... is that children learn to manage money in an effective way. With limited amount of income from wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hem the opportunity to manage the money in an effective way. Nevertheless, despite the basic bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, i think, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80842911877 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44409610893 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2166665813 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6428571429 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358523864019 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121966505915 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968436881803 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225368424583 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113039947904 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.