News stories on TV and in the newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion?
News has become prominent these days, by displaying the facts happening around. With the advancement in technology, it is possible to provide live coverage from any part of the world; making it possible to display news even from Antarctica to India without any delays. Furthermore, the news is often highlighted with relevant pictures, which some people find it catchy and effective in delivering the right message, which is discussed in details in the below paragraphs.
Nowadays, the world is badly affected by the pandemic situation and fighting against the deadly virus. Most often every news channel shows the image of the virus along with the medical staff or a bottle of medicine. By these visuals, it is evident that the telecast is about the coronavirus. The pictures send a direct message to the viewer and if that interest him/her then he/she can continue watching or else change the channel.
Even the newspaper editor, put the relatable picture alongside as per the news printed. Furthermore, the entire newspaper is divided into various columns: local news, national news, science, entertainment, sports, etcetera. According to the reader's interest, one can easily find out the desired column by simply looking at the pictures on the page. For example, the sports column will be showcasing the sports images like a player celebrating after scoring a goal or a batsman hitting a ball and many more.
Research in the media industry exclaims that pictures are effective in delivering messages to the crowd in a small space. Only written content in the newspaper or a journalist speaking on television does not attract the viewership making it mundane. Whereas a company like Amul, its marketing strategies works totally on pictures displaying the current affairs promoting a brand along with the social message.
To sum up, we cannot deny the fact that the news with proper images which does not hurt anyone's sentiments are effective in covering the appropriate message to its audience whether it can be written content or visual news.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-28 | ielts_tony | 67 | view |
2022-07-07 | Hemantbali | 61 | view |
2022-02-09 | padmaJ | 73 | view |
2021-11-06 | Kulpreet Kaur | 87 | view |
2021-09-10 | tiencdh | 73 | view |
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages Give reasons for your answe 89
- Of all public transportation options a metro is the most convenient way to get around a large city Do you agree or disagree 93
- Employers should give longer holidays to employees to encourage them to do their jobs well Do you agree 78
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... pictures on the page. For example, the sports column will be showcasing the sports im...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, then, whereas, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18318318318 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6784194383 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603603603604 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3071309986 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.066666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211101547756 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649390440677 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406317702723 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103663580221 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282700459992 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... pictures on the page. For example, the sports column will be showcasing the sports im...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, then, whereas, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18318318318 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6784194383 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603603603604 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3071309986 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.066666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211101547756 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649390440677 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406317702723 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103663580221 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282700459992 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.