Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books. What is your opinion?
In today’s world, there is a public debate regarding the type of books which children should read. Many parents think that reading books for entertainment is time-wasting for children. Instead of reading this sort of book, they should only read serious educational books. From my perspective, I remain unconvinced with this view because of the merits of reading books regarding entertainment.
To begin with, it cannot be denied that in this day and age, there are many non-sense entertaining books for children published. To put it in another way, these books cannot bring any benefits for children. For instance, the comics about Crayon Shin-Chan, which are meaningless and cannot help children learn any beneficial things from these stories. For this reason, reading books like that is a waste of time.
On the other hand, one convincing explanation in support of encouraging children reading entertaining books is that this kind of books might have a positive influence on their study. To clarify, they can have a chance to expose themselves to the common words used at school when reading these books. This is shown by the following example. In a personal and published study of over 1,000 comics and their inclusion of higher-order words, most comic books and graphic novels featured an astonishing 36% -76% of their text as representative of language found in senior secondary school and college placement tests. As a result, it is undisputed that reading books in regard to amusement brings many good sides for children’s study.
Taking everything into consideration, it may be concluded that there are many plus sides which reading entertaining books, apart from the nonsensical, can bring to children. Consequently, I am of the view that children should read not only educational books but also those related to relaxation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-16 | lhm.ils | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | lhm.ils | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Jagdeep kaur | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | Har preet singh | 67 | view |
- With the development of technology and science some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot Should we encourage the art area 61
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 91
- Many employers are employing people with good social skills as well as good qualifications Do you agree or disagree that good social skills is as important as good qualifications to succeed in job 67
- Some parents think that advertisements are misleading for children while advertisers claim that they provide knowledge Discuss both view 87
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reading books regarding entertainment. To begin with, it cannot be denied that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, regarding, second, so, apart from, for instance, kind of, sort of, as a result, in regard to, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22635135135 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87888390117 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8545551638 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531986841427 0.244688304435 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210496434765 0.084324248473 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149301403621 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34918154233 0.151304729494 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120877623813 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.