Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world is changing continuously and this change is inevitable. Many things once unimaginable are now true and feasible. Due the fast change people are now less happy than past is the given prompt and with this someone would agree, others would not. In my view, the rapid change in our present world has bring many salubrious effects of our lives and it will become understandable by my following two important reason.
The main reason is that the world is now more technologically updated than earlier time. As technology is more advance and fast, we are now closing many earlier gaps such as communication, transport and also depression. For instance, 10 years ago, we were communicating with our relatives in a physical presence, it took more time to travel. Moreover, on these days, the transportation were tiresome. But now, by connecting through social medias the physical presence to meet with our close ones became obsolete. And also, the hectic and low grade transportation is also solved by the advancement of fast and updated transportation. As you can see that, technology brings good that save our time also curb earlier hurdles of transportation, so our life now more pleasurable than past.
Another reason is that the development of medical sectors are now more advanced. Due to the changing health areas such as fast diagnosis instruments, elimination of pandemics by discovering potential vaccines and telemedicine, we are now experiencing more secure than earlier world. To be more specific, in 1919 when the plague was devastating our world, we had not enough room to defend but to concede its aggression. For this reason, millions of lives were lost and these blistering signature is still understandable. Apart from that, now we have advanced medical research facilities and faster approach to defend the pandemic. Then, who in the earth says, we are not happy in this advanced world?
To wrap up, it is true that someone argue by taking side of the past world but in reality the advantage we are now experiencing is hard to disregard. The changing modern world not only reduced our communication gap with our relatives but also ensure a better life expectancy. So, we should acknowledge the changing world than to disregard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Professors benefit from appearing on TV 65
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...e rapid change in our present world has bring many salubrious effects of our lives an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, then, apart from, for instance, such as, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0752688172 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9682337523 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4773959618 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230648140275 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740003740915 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526745503929 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152773719305 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539550035502 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.