Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information aboutthe private lives of famous people. Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped. Discuss both views
In recent years, information about the private life of celebrity increasingly become so popular on all magazines that readers may not have more interest in them. To a certain degree, overusing that kind of information can be considered as an immoral action and be disapproved worldwide. However, some arguments appear to support that action as a key means, which provide readers what to evaluate whether or not celebrities fulfill their roles as public figures. In this essay, both sides of this issue will be discussed.
On the one hand, it can be understandable that private information can be viewed as an exclusive property to each person in society. Obviously, governments have made some regulations in respecting the private life of each citizen; otherwise people those who have violated can be charged up to several years. The line of reasoning lies in the fact that revealing private information of famous people publicly can make a proper chance for criminals or hackers penetrate into their paying accounts like bank account, credit card so as to extract a huge money from big banks on their behalf. More than that, their information can be imitated with the purpose of trading or signing fake contracts with important customers to benefit.
On the other hand, some arguments support that celebrities are public figures that need to be evaluated by the masses for further supporting or boycotting. In other words, if one person has been recognized as a celebrity, he or she must have the responsibility for representing the public’s speech to protect society’s benefits. By that reason, any change in the celebrity’s attitude or behavior must be observed by journalists in time for the public to keep with up as soon as possible. Furthermore, not only does exploring the celebrity’s information help readers’ demand, but it still also be an opportunity for marketing companies to bring in money through their endorsements when they are hunted more on all magazines.
To sum up, like us, the celebrities should be viewed as normal people those who also need to have individual rights and respect from all people. Therefore, to a certain degree, exploring their information should be banned if their life is annoyed over limit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-13 | LE ANH HUY | 78 | view |
- More and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How can these problems be solved 73
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information aboutthe private lives of famous people Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped Discuss both views 78
- Even though globalization affects the world s economies in a positive way its negative side should not be forgotten Discuss 78
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society 11
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... which provide readers what to evaluate whether or not celebrities fulfill their roles as publ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...accounts like bank account, credit card so as to extract a huge money from big banks on ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge money'.
Suggestion: huge money
...k account, credit card so as to extract a huge money from big banks on their behalf. More th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, as to, kind of, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13351498638 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92337176952 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561307901907 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0016506336 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240097384604 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908917509734 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456679707064 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154048836039 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289449451388 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... which provide readers what to evaluate whether or not celebrities fulfill their roles as publ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 526, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...accounts like bank account, credit card so as to extract a huge money from big banks on ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge money'.
Suggestion: huge money
...k account, credit card so as to extract a huge money from big banks on their behalf. More th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, as to, kind of, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13351498638 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92337176952 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561307901907 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0016506336 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240097384604 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908917509734 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456679707064 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154048836039 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289449451388 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.