Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Space is one of the fascinating thing from the time our planet started its journey. It is apparent that the inquisitive mind always want to explore the unknown and unseen whatever it is not a big deal. Expending a lots of money behind exoplanets is not a discreet idea for government is the given statement- with this someone would agree, others would not. In my view, budgeting the huge sum of money for space exploration is a kind of waste because there are many pressing issues in our world is wait to be noticed and I am going to delineates more regarding my position by giving following two reason.
The main reason is that in every years millions of people are dying due to poverty. Poverty is the critical issue in the underdeveloped and developing countries where the basic human rights is always facing questions. For example, a few days ago I heard a news about the Haiti-a country of Africa where malnourishment of children became a cliché and money inflation is a usual topic. If the money would use for this country then it is possible to protect million lives and maintain the money for reducing inflation. In the face of reality, spending money for space exploration is like a battering of these people. This experience taught me that our government should notice the vulnerable people fast because it entails the human rights then do exploration whether is it space or under the ocean is not a matter.
Another reason is that there are a lots of things in the inside world is still undiscovered. From underground to underwater is the area where humans discovery is still in infantile nature. By working on these sides it is possible to unearth some new findings that would enough to change the haul of the research. To be more specific, the famous BBC narrator David Attenborough said in his new TV series Animal Planet that only 5% of our ocean is discovered and rest of the still in mystery. Moreover, he noted that, there is a vast field of research area in the heart of Sahara Desert where it is possible to explore a new way to live. Although, scientist and government are trying hard to find a hospitable place to support the billions of world population but their ignorance to consider the unexplored regions of the world such as Sahara desert and North Pole is not understandable. As you can see that there are many places in our world remains uncanny and undiscovered then it is easy to conclude working outside of the earth is seems to me preposterous.
In conclusion, although it is possible for someone would argue by delineating support for the space research and funding but in reality these arguments will not convincing. As many people are dying for poverty and many unexplored areas are wait to discover then such profiligating is not a discreet choice. So, government should use their money for reasonable reasons rather than spending behind the illusion.
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest f 75
- The Little Ice Age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900C E There were unusually harsh winters and glaciers grew larger in many areas Scientists have long wondered what caused 80
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 68
- Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a method of 80
- The article discuses the paintings that Rembrant painted and it claims that they are doubts that it was painted by him But the professor challenges these points The first point that article makes is that the woman who was painted in Rembrants picture was 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...hatever it is not a big deal. Expending a lots of money behind exoplanets is not a dis...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 535, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'delineate'.
Suggestion: delineate
...is wait to be noticed and I am going to delineates more regarding my position by giving fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ns. For example, a few days ago I heard a news about the Haiti-a country of Africa whe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... country then it is possible to protect million lives and maintain the money for reduci...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...er. Another reason is that there are a lots of things in the inside world is still ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'convince'
Suggestion: convince
...but in reality these arguments will not convincing. As many people are dying for poverty a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 15.1003584229 245% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76938369781 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71011711413 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502982107356 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.820915926 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.95 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.15 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223471327569 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598189368065 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603523244544 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141704330665 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667639407538 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.