Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
There is no doubt about group workings can help people to improve their skills and lead to increase the progress of projects, but working in groups may confront group members to many problems that one of the important ones is matching the members. My attitude toward this issue is that if all of the group members are willing to do their works match to other people, it can be more helpful for themselves and others rather than they insist on their attitudes and do their duties without considering others, and I will elaborate on this issue in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the most important thing when each person wants to do their jobs in groups is preserving the group discipline and in the shade of this issue, each member should match their duties with others. As a matter of fact, if each person wants to do on their own feet, preserving a group from becoming chaotic is so hard because each person does their jobs, so this can threaten the group ends and may create many problems. To elaborate more on this issue I can mention one of my memories. When I went to university, one of my professors categorized his class students into eight groups, and I should work with other people. The first day, they gathered in the library in order to divide duties between us, and each one admitted their works after all they decided to gather after five days to declare others from progress and what each one did in about their duties. When we wanted to hold a second meeting, one of my group members, Maryam, came and said she wanted to do their jobs the other way, and the second meeting return to a hostile one. No one did not talk about what they did and they left the meeting. Some of us did not want to have any other meetings and they wanted to do their jobs on their own. Finally, the deadline for the project came and each of us gave their own to the professor. After a while, he called us to his office and said these projects which all of us did it by ourselves was not worth it because he decided an especial and a great amount of grade to the group working so he decided to fail us and did it. Therefore, one anomaly or chaotic happened between group members can contribute to eliminating group discipline, so had Maryam do their affairs as the others, in the end, we could pass the course and we did not have to tolerate the whole burden of the project on our shoulder.
All in all, if each member of the group wants to do their duties without considering others, they may face not only other members with catastrophic situations in which somehow compensating the consequences is hard but these kinds of people also harm themselves.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students What is your view 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more effective if teachers let students learn record lecture before class and discuss and practice during class 73
- tpo 44 70
- Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses 1 Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one 2 Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y attitude toward this issue is that if all of the group members are willing to do their w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, after all, no doubt, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 484.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48347107438 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33576002166 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45041322314 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.931944199 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5714285714 20.6045352989 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279066956911 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107045946219 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768497817857 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211687488574 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07404806999 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 10.002688172 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 10.247311828 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.