The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The three pie diagrams, in percentage terms, depict the breakdown of daily meals onto nutrients, that can be dangerous for the health when consumed in excessive amounts.
As could be noticed from the diagrams, each meal includes the consumption of three main nutrients: sodium, saturated fat, and added sugars. The greatest portion of sodium as well as saturated fat are eaten at dinner, while added sugar is consumed mostly with snakes taken during the day.
On average, people take lunch that includes 30% of sodium, 37% of saturated fat, and 23% of sugar, while dinner has 43%, 37%, and 23% of sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar correspondingly. Breakfast, being the most important meal, includes an almost equal proportion of sodium, saturated fat, and added sugars consumed that each amounts to give-or-take 15 percent.
Taken as a whole, one can notice, that the average dinner is most high in all three nutrients, summing together the total percentage of the nutrients under control amounts to 103%. While USA citizens' sodium, sugar, and saturated fats intake during breakfast is comparatively lower, around 14-16% each time.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-08 nobitaa 78 view
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 11 view
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-04 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-06 Tosyne 67 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fats'' or 'fat's'?
Suggestion: fats'; fat's
...A citizens sodium, sugar, and saturated fats intake during breakfast is comparativel...
^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atively lower, around 14-16% each time.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24043715847 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62284835865 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.545192709 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112597803864 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635545742198 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545624999745 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831804193412 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353259646827 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.