When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life died of. It is pointless to try to and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
it is debatable issue to saving traditional way when new technology has invented and government should not spent amount to alive old skills. I totally agree with this view. Therefore, I will explain the benefit of the latest invention, but i will also explain some strong point about traditional skills.
The most important reason for choosing modern skill is that it is cheapest and fastest technic for working in industries while many time took with the hand skills which waste the innumerable hour of people. For example, plethora of machinery have available in the market which do much of work in few second instead of traditional way that can take many days for completing such as hand embroidery. Hence, hand work cannot hit the modern equipment.
On the other hand, many of employment depent upon tradition skill which would vanish after innovation of industry and machine would take the place of human. As a result, plethore people can face unemployment problem and country have also influence of the economy crisis issue. For instance, the latest survey shows that 50% of population would jobless if government will not expend sufficient amount of money for saving it. Thus, we cannot say that spent money on traditional way. In fact, it beneficial for worker as well government.
In conclusion, new renovation of technology improves production of factory, but it had terminated historical method of work. For removing this problem, nation should spend financial fund on hand skills which is not negative impact on nation it they try to save their unique way of working country
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-07 | Harkirat123 | 61 | view |
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken the solve these problems 84
- the table below shows the percentage of main types of dwelling in Victoria the Northern Territory and Tasmania Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 74
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influence people when they buy food 74
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is debatable issue to saving traditiona...
^^
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
... technology has invented and should not spent amount to alive old skills. I totally a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
... Therefore, I will explain the benefit of latest invention, but i will also explain some...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...in the benefit of latest invention, but i will also explain some strong point abo...
^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...test technic for working in industries. Whereas, The many time took with the hand skill...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...for working in industries. Whereas, The many time took with the hand skills which waste t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ern equipment. On the other hand, many of employment depent upon tradition skil...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
...f the economy crisis issue. For instance, latest survey shows that 50% of population wou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... way. In fact, it beneficial for worker as well as government. In conclusion, n...
^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icial for worker as well as government. In conclusion, new renovation of technol...
^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'terminated'.
Suggestion: terminated
...proves production of factory, but it is terminate historical method of work. For removing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... try to save their unique way of working country
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05363984674 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61718077479 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6930926151 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2142857143 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169933804542 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592449172606 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051620440621 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105860862402 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382411103697 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.