The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years of 2005 and 2006
This table is illustrating the worldwide market share of mobile phone market by manufacturers between 2005 to 2006.
According to the table, Nokia is the largest market share in both 2005 and 2006, even more there was slight increase by 2.5% in the following year, which made Nokia taking 35% of overall market.
Despite the largest market share, there is a surprising increase of Motorola’s market share, increased by 3.4% within one year, which made Motorola the highest increase of market shares in 2006. Additionally, Sony Ericsson’s market share also increased in some degree.
Another striking trend is shown in Ben Q mobile, which decreased by 4.9% to 2.4% in 2005 to 2006. Not only Ben Q mobile, but also Samsung and LG’s market shares are dropped by 1.1% and 0.4% comparatively.
The table also highlighting the fact that other manufacturers market share is significantly fall by 3% in 2006.
In sum, Nokia is still in the largest market share of mobile phone manufacturer and conversely, other manufacturer’s market share is moderately decreased that year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-08 | tamir052222 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reading the newspaper or online news sources is a waste of time Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 53
- Many people say that only way to guarantee getting a good job is to complete a course of university education Others claim that it is better to start work after school and gain experience in the world of work How far do you agree or disagree with the abov 73
- Travelling in other country 70
- discussion about historical source written by Chevaliar de Seingalt 81
- Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18 Some psychologist claims that the basic reason for this is that children these days not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teachers 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18285714286 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89602119735 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1153974816 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.541596679884 0.215688989381 251% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.280625933247 0.103423049105 271% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166476066069 0.0843802449381 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33744449795 0.15604864568 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154219273816 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.