the graph below shows about car ownership between 1975 and 2015
The line graph illustrates the proportion of cars owned by people living in Britain over a period of 30 years, commencing in 1975.
As can be inferred from the graph, while there were gradual increases in the percentage of owning 2 cars and 3 cars, the downward trend was seen in that of having no car. Another key feature is that possessing 1 car accounted for the highest rate during the period shown.
In 1975, the ratio of having 3 cars in the UK was lowest, with approximately 4%. This figure rose gradually to in the vicinity of 10% by 2005. A similar upward trend was witnessed in the figure for 2 cars, with which climbing from about 6% in 1975 to nearly 19% by the end of the period studied.
A downward pattern was registered in the proportion of having no car. To be specific, the rate of no car was about 44%. This figure decreased significantly to approximately 22% by the last year. Finally, there was a gradual fall in the ratio of possessing 1 car, from 45% in the year 1975 to about 39% in 1985, before climbing considerably to 45% by the end of the period survey.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- task 1 11
- Writing task 1 11
- the chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 61
- Some people say that increasing business and cultural contacts between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Writing task 1 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% in the year 1975 to about 39% in 1985, before climbing considerably to 45% by t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.407960199 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60190919083 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517412935323 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2579722859 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200189769948 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851685109327 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052056343641 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13427748117 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141072681766 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.