Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Human-being is a creature who has a great demand in making communities with others. We all have to have relations ships with our friends, our colleagues, our apartment owner, our boss, and generally most of society members. Many critics state that people should learn how to have a good community with others from younger ages by doing group working in school. However, some others oppose this opinion by stating that although people must learn how to live in society, it is not necessary for them to learn it from childhood. They claim that children should also learn how to be an individual person. These two statements made a controversial issue between critics. I, personally contend that the former statement is more considerable that the latter. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that group working can develop their personality and make them ready for their future challenges in society. If a child always does his responsibilities lonely, he will be a secluded person in his future life in society. However, students who usually work together, play group games, etc., they will more effective in society and they will have better life during their relationships with other society members. For instance, one of my friends named Farhad who was my classmates in primary school always was a solitary person and preferred to his careers individually. Now he has serious problems in his life. He argues with his colleagues due to a small problem. His colleagues and even his wife know him as a person without social intelligence who cannot have good relationships with others.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that working with another people, specifically people who are our friends can be funnier than working lonely. Doing projects with others make lot of memories for us and we can be more happy during doing affairs, even it is hard to do. For example, I remember when I was a student, one of the teachers defined us a project, and told us you are free whether do the projects lonely or in a group. My friends and I decided to work together, we were going to one of group mates, and we have done a little activities about our project and then started to play a PlayStation game. Now, after 20 years, we usually talk about those days, and funny moments that we had.
In conclusion, I think as being an effective person in society is inevitable, it is better to learn it from younger ages by working with other classmates.
- TPO26 70
- TPO 28 70
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 70
- TPO 04 Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 550, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'activity'?
Suggestion: activity
... group mates, and we have done a little activities about our project and then started to p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88735632184 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68129755642 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526436781609 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3704707425 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.238095238 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04761904762 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232627881979 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063272724062 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611563460451 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139339965851 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608589447179 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.