The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the shares of British students who have proficiency to speak on other languages. The surveyed data represents the changes during a decade, from 2000 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is of note one third part of all university students in Britain have no ability to speak foreign languages, and by 2010 the proportion of them rose by 5%.
In 2000, French and other languages spoken students accounted for the equals shares, constituting 15 % of the total amount of students. But in a decade the percentages has experienced some moderate changes: the number of French spoken people has been increased by 5%, whereas students with knowledge of other prominent languages has kept a balance at 10% with pupils who do not have a talent for any foreign languages.
Turning to the remaining groups of students, it is apparent that rate of students spoken on two other languages except English was totaling approximately to German speaking students in the early 00s, hovering around 10%. When by the end of 2010 its quantity has surpassed the students with ability to speak in German, and that was 15% and 10 % respectively. The share of students who speak Spanish was dramatically dropped by 10% during a decade, from 20% to just 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-20 | Anastasia0511 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | Anastasia0511 | 78 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is positive or negative situations 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 84
- The two maps below show the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, third, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74287634402 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586046511628 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2562010626 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228952081532 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107118201188 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038373765394 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145753464468 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287021441137 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.