People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellows or co-workers-than from those at higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether people should learn from close relatives or take into account the wisdom of grown-ups or supervisors. Although the opinions of teachers and supervisors based on their experience are highly valuable, I dare say that learning things from co-workers and generating ideas with fellows, who are not afraid of making their own mistakes, has its benefits. I firmly believe, that in order to succeed the one should behave consistently with relatives and their “generation rules”.
To begin with, the opinions of experienced people, such as teachers or supervisors, are unquestionably valuable and should be taken into account. Their personal experience and special knowledge may foster the decrease in number of mistakes, which are taken by inexperienced people. For example, the supervisor or mentor may boost one’s career development through providing considerable number of valuable advises on the steps which should be taken further. Moreover, the lack of life experience make it hardly possible to make right career choices without comprehensive understanding of the possible consequences.
Nonetheless, learning things on one’s own level, cooperating with co-workers and fellows has its clear benefits. Making own mistakes usually is a more valuable thing and the easiest way to exclude repetition of them in the future. To be specific, the one’s life provides more lessons than a life of a teacher or a mentor, who obtained their personal life experience through making their own choices or taking advises from their relative or ancestors. Indeed, the more mistakes a person makes on his own, the better he understands the possible solutions of this mistakes.
By the same token, the fellows usually better understand the generation with whom people on their level cooperate. Co-workers may behave more appropriately than supervisors may advise them to behave. Generations change rapidly and their habits so too. The one should be “on the same wave” as their current bosses, who may prefer doing sports in the middle of a working day. Hence, in order to grow in a company where bosses are relatively young, one should behave himself in a specific manner, which might significantly differ from those of teacher’s.
All in all, taking advantage of using advises from both supervisors and those on own level is desirable. However, the fear of making one’s own mistakes is greatly exaggerated. By making wrong choices the one develops as a person with his own wisdom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Winner_007 | 73 | view |
- Altruism is a type of behaviour in which 80
- In the past several years a number of technological advances have made laser eye surgery more widely available The procedure uses tiny lasers to alter the surface of the eyeball significantly improving a patient s vision In spite of its growing popularity 81
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style and inde 3
- Organic food 3
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Opinions vary with the regard to the question of whether people should learn from close relative...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e understands the possible solutions of this mistakes. By the same token, the fell...
^^^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific manner" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tively young, one should behave himself in a specific manner, which might significantly differ from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, such as, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32338308458 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87594895625 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507462686567 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3117186681 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.631578947 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279117109585 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864905061162 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739905742136 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162126989516 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590804577514 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.