The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given pictures compare the waterfront area of Darwin town in terms of the development in distinctive years namely 2009 and 2014.
It is obvious that the town registered a number of substantial changes. Overall, some infrastructure and amenities replaced the industrial area to meet residents’ basic needs.
In 2014, to the south of the waterfront, most areas used for the industry were replaced by many trees in order to create fresh air. Additionally, the residential buildings in the center of the town were doubled in number and a new university building was constructed to provide more educational places for people. Moreover, in 2014, a harbor built on the seashore combining with the expanded footpath helped to improve the town’s tourism.
In 2014, in the north area of the town, the industrial area next to the lake was demolished to make way for a small swimming pool to encourage people to play sports. Meanwhile, the school, the convention center, and the area for fishing still remained in the same location as in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-18 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | nguyne | 100 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | vungochuyen25 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- What are the causes effects solutions for global warming 84
- EX 4 The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Ex 2 The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02873563218 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85768602221 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8647042196 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184897261641 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776414585963 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472597201536 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114952986012 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474776146916 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.