The line graph below shows the main reasons people gave for moving away from a particular capital city to the countryside.
The graph illustrates some of the factors which caused residents, living in urban areas, to relocate to rural areas in two decades.
Overal, it is obvious that, increase in living costs led most of the people to move to the countryside, while also regular congestions on roads and poor quality of life made a lot of people consider moving from a capital city.
In 1990, rise in living expances was a main reason for nearly 65000 people fleeing capital to the countryside. It had kept increasing by 2000 to 85000 and from this point it startded declining slowly to last point which was 80000.
Unlike the first factor, the other two presented similar changes in this 20 -year period. 20000 people decidee to start a new life in the countryside because of typical traffic problems in capital in 1990. The same figure goes for lifestyle starting with 20000. By 2000 traffic issues caused ober 30000 people to move away while a little less than this number of people relocated due to poor lifestyle. After that, relocating to countryside because of traffic reached 60000 whilst 40000 as relult of hectic lifestyle in a capital city at the end of this given period.
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The line graph below shows the main reasons people gave for moving away from a particular capital city to the countryside 88
- In some countries teenegers uave part time jobs while they are still at school What benefits does this bring a child Are there any drawbacks 64
- The graph shows date about the average saturday salesof two bakeries in london in 2010 Summerize the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 55
- These days people work in more than one job and often change their career several times during their life What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
The graph illustrates some of the factors which caused residents, living ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82089552239 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42554534406 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616915422886 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3088169001 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247246344559 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894199766307 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063097635864 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125893775003 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533088744475 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.