The rules that society expect young people to follow or obey are too strict.agee or disagee
By and large, it is an established and undeniable fact that the world is operating on a majestic principle controlled by some sovereign. Vividly, To progress in this globe, rules, and ordinance play a critically important role. In this regard, societies develop regulations to maintain order in communities. There are different schools of thought amongst people where some consider them as a big barrier to their free will, others contemplate them righteous to the society. If I were asked, I would completely disagree that rules which societies expect young people to follow are too strict. I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first reason to elucidate my standpoint is associate with the notion that these regulations are for the betterment of individuals. To be more specific, they provide the city with revenue, which could be used to establish the community and advance in society. British imposed policies to control smoking and revenue collected is invested in the education of the country. Not only it results in revenue, but also it minimizes the offenses from society. For instance, my hometown faces the problem of unemployment. If it gets enough revenue, a factory could be built which not only provides job opportunities to town dwellers but also reduce the crime rates. It is clear to see rules are not strict rather youngsters need to follow these rules.
The second rationale behind my reason is rooted in the fact that rules are for the safety and welfare of people. In a haphazard society where there is no ordinance, implementing no rule would be devastating. It is worth mentioning that they these rule are made after thorough consideration of certain factors. The more strict a rule is, the fewer the number of casualties and dangers associated with that. For instance, the impaired driving rule; what would happen if youngsters are not told to limit the alcohol intake while driving. They would get into life-threatening accidents, as a result. Those who impair drive do not only risk their own lives, but they risk other lives too. It is crystal clear to see stricter rules are need of society.
BY perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that rules which society makes are not too strict and betterment of young generations. For the sake of brevity, few points are reiterating. First, the rules are of paramount importance for the infrastructure of a developed society. Second, They are not too hard to follow and are only to prevent hazardous circumstances. As for the writer's opinion, I vehemently urge people to follow the rules they are there for you and for everyone else well being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-22 | Attia Yaqoob | 73 | view |
- living today is much more easoier than when your parents were children 90
- paper vs electronis devices 86
- playing simpler toys and playing outside is better than playing videos games and computers for children development 90
- which way of communication is better talikng over phone or talikg through text message and emials 90
- If universities are given financial support to develop researches which one do you think would receive more benefits To predict weather more accurately To clean rivers and oceans To deal with outer space 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ent hazardous circumstances. As for the writers opinion, I vehemently urge people to fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in fact, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01128668172 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8208341876 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534988713318 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0132850615 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.3846153846 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0384615385 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96153846154 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248758604587 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651222449925 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102279516143 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158398261191 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742345426509 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.